Abstract
Practitioners can present and discuss decisions about the management of health problems in a variety of ways during consultations. This paper examines in detail how doctors talk with patients in relation to decision-making about treatment. Conversation analyses of decision-making sequences in consultations about diabetes in primary care and about treatment of ear nose and throat (ENT) cancer in a specialist oncology setting, both in the UK, revealed a spectrum of practitioner approaches ranging from more 'bilateral' to more 'unilateral'. This paper identifies the key communicative and organisational features of these approaches and provides some preliminary observations about the implications of these for patient participation in decision-making.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 2611-2627 |
| Number of pages | 17 |
| Journal | Social Science & Medicine |
| Volume | 61 |
| Issue number | 12 |
| Early online date | 11 Jul 2005 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - Dec 2005 |
UN SDGs
This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)
-
SDG 3 Good Health and Well-being
Keywords
- doctor-patient consultations
- decision-making
- conversation analysis
- patient participation
- United Kingdom
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of ''Unilateral' and 'bilateral' practitioner approaches in decision-making about treatment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Cite this
- APA
- Standard
- Harvard
- Vancouver
- Author
- BIBTEX
- RIS