The concept of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD) control has been developed to inform therapeutic decision-making. We explored the validity of a definition of COPD control in a representative population of patients with COPD in the United Kingdom. Electronic medical records and linked COPD questionnaire data from the Optimum Patient Care Research Database were used to characterize control status. Patients were aged ≥40 years, with spirometry-confirmed COPD, current or ex-smokers, and continuous records throughout the study period. Control was evaluated based on COPD stability and patients' (i) clinical features or (ii) COPD Assessment Test (CAT) score over a three-month baseline period and linked to time to first exacerbation. Of 2788 eligible patients, 2511 (90%) had mild/moderate COPD and 277 (10%) had severe/very severe COPD based on Body Mass Index, Obstruction, Dyspnoea, Exacerbations (BODEx) cut-off of 4. Within the mild/moderate cohort, 4.5% of patients were controlled at baseline according to clinical features and 21.5% according to CAT threshold of 10. Within the severe/very severe cohort, no patients were controlled at baseline according to the proposed clinical features and 8.3% were controlled according to CAT threshold of 20. Compared with uncontrolled patients, time to first exacerbation was longer for controlled patients with mild/moderate COPD but not for those with severe/very severe COPD. Lowering the BODEx threshold for severity classification to 2 increased the number of patients achieving control. CAT scores were not good predictors of the risk of future exacerbation. With the proposed definition, very few patients were defined as controlled.
|Number of pages||9|
|Journal||COPD: Journal of Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease|
|Early online date||16 Aug 2017|
|Publication status||Published - 2017|
Bibliographical noteDear David,
if you wish to consider the following article for submission to the next REF please forward a copy of the accepted manuscript (before the publisher formatting has been applied) and we will upload to Pure/AURA in compliance with the REF and publisher policies.
To be eligible for submission to the next REF all articles and conference proceedings published with an ISSN and accepted for publication from 1st April 2016 must have the accepted manuscript deposited in the institutional repository as soon after acceptance as possible and no later than 3 months from first online publication. The easiest way to ensure you comply is when you have a paper accepted for publication forward the confirmation of acceptance and the accepted manuscript to firstname.lastname@example.org and we will ensure the output is uploaded to Pure/AURA in accordance with the REF and publisher policies.
- Chronic Obstructive Pulmonary Disease (COPD)