Abstract
Does our conception of a target affect how we look for it? Previous investigations have
shown that search for an object with a unique identity is more efficient than search based
on unique orientation. Here we asked whether giving an orientation target an identity label
is sufficient to boost search efficiency. Participants completed two blocks of search for a line
tilted 45˚ to the right. Between blocks we induced an identity-based connection between the
participant and search target using the self-reference effect (SRE): participants learned to
associate the target to the label “you” and distractor lines to the label “strangers”. A second
experiment used the same paradigm but introduced a more intuitive relationship between
the label and the object form by embedding the line in a circle and adding two dots to create
face pictograms. The results of both experiments replicated the standard SRE as measured
by reaction time, but search was similarly inefficient when the instructions were to search
“for you” as they were in search for orientation. The results suggest search strategies are
not strongly influenced by how a target is conceived, ruling out an intuitively appealing
explanation for the large individual differences typically observed in search performance
shown that search for an object with a unique identity is more efficient than search based
on unique orientation. Here we asked whether giving an orientation target an identity label
is sufficient to boost search efficiency. Participants completed two blocks of search for a line
tilted 45˚ to the right. Between blocks we induced an identity-based connection between the
participant and search target using the self-reference effect (SRE): participants learned to
associate the target to the label “you” and distractor lines to the label “strangers”. A second
experiment used the same paradigm but introduced a more intuitive relationship between
the label and the object form by embedding the line in a circle and adding two dots to create
face pictograms. The results of both experiments replicated the standard SRE as measured
by reaction time, but search was similarly inefficient when the instructions were to search
“for you” as they were in search for orientation. The results suggest search strategies are
not strongly influenced by how a target is conceived, ruling out an intuitively appealing
explanation for the large individual differences typically observed in search performance
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Visual Cognition |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Accepted/In press - 9 Aug 2024 |
Keywords
- eye movements
- attention
- visual search
- self-reference effect