Research output per year
Research output per year
Personal profile
Research Profile
Dr Gyorfi's main teaching and research interests are in Legal Theory and Comparative Constitutional Law. He has published two books in Hungarian in these fields. (The Political Character of Judicial Review, 2001; The Perspectives of Contemporary Legal Positivism, 2006).
He is interested in supervising research students working in the following areas: Legal Theory (especially legal reasoning and the normativity of law), Public Law, Comparative Constitutional Law (especially constitutional judicial review, popular sovereignty), Human Rights (especially freedom of religion).
His current research revolves around the justification of constitutional judicial review, constitutional interpretation and the "juridification" of human rights protection. He is particularly interested in the theoretical issues raised by the weak form of judicial review.
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics where Tamas Gyorfi is active. These topic labels come from the works of this person. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- 1 Similar Profiles
Collaborations and top research areas from the last five years
Recent external collaboration on country/territory level. Dive into details by clicking on the dots or
-
Jogi érveléselmélet
Translated title of the contribution :The theory of legal reasoning Research output: Chapter in Book/Report/Conference proceeding › Entry for encyclopedia/dictionary
-
Judicial Individualism and Judicial Disagreement in Constitutional Reasoning
Gyorfi, T. & Boda-Balogh, E., 2020, In: Vienna Journal on International Constitutional Law. 14, 3, p. 231-251 20 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
-
The legitimacy of the European human rights regime: a view from the United Kingdom
Győrfi, T., Mar 2019, In: Global Constitutionalism. 8, 1, p. 123-156 34 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile2 Citations (Scopus)15 Downloads (Pure) -
Why Is the Equal Merit Principle (Almost) Straightforwardly Wrong?
Győrfi, T., Nov 2017, In: Modern Law Review. 80, 6, p. 1052-1072 20 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open AccessFile1 Citation (Scopus)15 Downloads (Pure) -
Is There a Fundamental Tension at the Heart of the Human Rights Act?
Gyorfi, T., 16 Jun 2017, In: SSRN. p. 1-5 5 p.Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review
Open Access
Datasets
-
HunConCourt database
Gyorfi, T. (Creator), Solyom, P. (Contributor), Kovacs, A. (Contributor), Fazekas, F. (Contributor), Deak, I. (Contributor) & Boda-Balogh, E. (Contributor), Mendeley Data, 2021
DOI: 10.17632/n5gcbkjrpg.2, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/n5gcbkjrpg
Dataset
-
Judicial individualism and judicial disagreement in constitutional reasoning
Gyorfi, T. (Creator) & Boda-Balogh, E. (Creator), Mendeley Data, 29 Jul 2020
DOI: 10.17632/cg6fjg75vx.1, https://data.mendeley.com/datasets/cg6fjg75vx
Dataset
-
Journal of Law and Society (Journal)
Tamas Gyorfi (Peer Review)
2021Activity: Publication peer-review and editorial work › Publication Peer review
-
Constitutionalism and Disagreement
Tamas Gyorfi (Speaker)
9 May 2019 → 10 May 2019Activity: Attending or organising an event › Attending/organising a Conference
File -
Is Weak Judicial Review a Viable Alternative in Europe?
Tamas Gyorfi (Speaker)
6 Jul 2017Activity: Disseminating Research › Invited talk
File -
Judicial diversity - why is the rate of progress so slow?
Tamas Gyorfi (Speaker)
15 Nov 2017Activity: Disseminating Research › Invited talk