A critical review of labelling techniques used to quantify rhizosphere carbon-flow

Andrew A. Meharg

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

114 Citations (Scopus)


The rhizosphere is a major sink for photo-assimilated carbon and quantifying inputs into this sink is one of the main goals of rhizosphere biology as organic carbon lost from plant roots supports a higher microbial population in the rhizosphere compared to bulk soil. Two fundamentally different (CO2)-C-14 labelling strategies have been developed to estimate carbon fluxes through the rhizosphere-continuous feeding of shoots with labelled carbon dioxide and pulse-chase experiments. The biological interpretation that can be placed on the results of labelling experiments is greatly biased by the technique used. It is the purpose of this paper to assess the advantages, disadvantages and the biological interpretation of both continuous and pulse labelling and to consider how to partition carbon fluxes within the rhizosphere.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)55-62
Number of pages8
JournalPlant and Soil
Issue number1
Publication statusPublished - 1994


  • carbon-flow
  • carbon cycling
  • continuous labeling
  • pulse labeling
  • rhizosphere
  • roots
  • soil microbial biomass
  • root-derived material
  • festuca-pratensis L
  • lolium-perenne
  • assimilated carbon
  • substrate flow
  • fixed carbon
  • plant-roots
  • field plots
  • wheat


Dive into the research topics of 'A critical review of labelling techniques used to quantify rhizosphere carbon-flow'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this