Abstract
INTRODUCTION AND AIMS: Traditionally, neurologically pristine patients with a thunderclap headache are investigated with a non-contrast computed tomography (CT) brain scan, which if negative is followed by a lumbar puncture (LP) to exclude important secondary causes, particularly subarachnoid haemorrhage (SAH). However, misdiagnosis of such patients is still a cause of significant human and financial cost and a regular reason for medical litigation. This study explores the approach of emergency medicine and acute medicine clinicians to the investigation of a patient with thunderclap headache.
METHODS: Clinicians were invited to complete an online survey based on a clinical vignette of a 45-year-old man presenting with a thunderclap headache who had a pristine neurological examination.
RESULTS: A total of 160 clinicians responded. The majority (89%) elected to perform a non-contrast CT brain as their first investigation, though five clinicians discharged the patient without investigation. If the CT was negative, only 84% would then proceed to LP, but 20% would undertake this investigation before 12 hours from headache onset.
CONCLUSIONS: Most clinicians investigate neurologically intact patients with thunderclap headache following a CT/LP strategy, but deviations from recommended practice are common.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 207-214 |
Number of pages | 8 |
Journal | Journal of the Royal College of Physicians of Edinburgh |
Volume | 43 |
Issue number | 3 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 2013 |
Keywords
- Brain
- Cerebrospinal Fluid
- Data Collection
- Diagnosis, Differential
- Headache Disorders, Primary
- Humans
- Intracranial Aneurysm
- Male
- Middle Aged
- Physician's Practice Patterns
- Spinal Puncture
- Subarachnoid Hemorrhage
- Tomography, X-Ray Computed
- Survey
- Thunderclap Headache