Addressing priorities for surgical research in Africa: implementation of a multicentre cloud‐based peri‐operative registry in Ethiopia

Network for Perioperative Critical care (N4PCc)

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

10 Citations (Scopus)
6 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

In resource‐constrained settings, where inequalities in access to and quality of surgical care results in excess mortality, peri‐operative care registries are uncommon. A south‐south collaboration supported the implementation of a context specific, clinician‐led, multicentre real‐time peri‐operative registry in Ethiopia. Peri‐operative information, including the Ethiopian Ministry of Health’s national ‘Saving Lives through Safe Surgery initiative’, was linked to real‐time dashboards, providing clinicians and administrators with information on service utilisation, surgical access, national surgical key performance indicators and measures of quality of care. We recruited four hospitals representing 285 in‐patient beds from the Amhara and Southern Nations Nationalities and Peoples regions and Addis Ababa city, and reported on 1748 consecutive surgical cases from April 2019 to April 2020. Key performance indicators included: compliance with the World Health Organization’s Surgical Safety Checklist in 1595 (92.1%) surgical cases; adverse events during anaesthesia in 33 (3.1%) cases; and surgical site infections in 21 (2.0%) patients. This collaboration has successfully implemented a multicentre digital surgical registry that can enable measurement of key performance indicators for surgery and evaluation of peri‐operative outcomes. The peri‐operative registry is currently being rolled out across the Amhara region and Addis Ababa city administration. It will provide continuous granular healthcare information necessary to empower clinicians to drive context‐specific priorities for service improvement and research, in collaboration with national stakeholders and international research consortiums.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)933-939
Number of pages7
JournalAnaesthesia
Volume76
Issue number7
Early online date25 Jan 2021
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Jul 2021

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
The Network for Perioperative and Critical care (N4PCc) authorship includes co‐ordinators and collaborators for the Ethiopian registry. AB is Chair and First Trustee of the Network for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training (UK Charity) and a volunteer with NICS‐MORU. RH is First Trustee of the Network for Improving Critical Care Systems and Training (UK Charity) and a Director (honorary) at NICS‐MORU. NICS‐MORU is a not‐for‐profit organisation based in Sri Lanka, which supported this pilot project and from which the registry originated. The pilot project has been supported by NICS‐MORU, which also partially supported FK’s fellowship period in Sri Lanka, key to the knowledge exchange and establishment of a community of practice. The project’s implementation and scale up is championed by DBU and FMOH.

Keywords

  • anaesthesia
  • clinical registries
  • postoperative morbidity
  • quality of care
  • surgery

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Addressing priorities for surgical research in Africa: implementation of a multicentre cloud‐based peri‐operative registry in Ethiopia'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this