Assessing Walking Limitations in Stroke Survivors: Are Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports Interchangeable?

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Objective: To examine the extent to which proxy-report measures adequately assess walking limitations and are interchangeable with self-report measures in stroke survivors. Design and Participants: Self-report, proxy-report, and observed performance measures of walking limitations were compared cross-sectionally on 3 occasions following the discharge from hospital of 101 stroke survivors. Correlations between measures, differences between mean scores, and agreement of self- and proxy reports were analyzed. Results and Conclusions: Self- and proxy-report measures correlated significantly with each other and with observed performance measures; differences between mean scores were not found. Agreement between individual self- and proxy-report pairs was poor, however, indicating that freely substituting proxy-report data for self-report data when self-report data are unavailable is inappropriate.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)177-183
Number of pages7
JournalRehabilitation Psychology
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - May 2007


  • walking limitations
  • activity limitations
  • measurement
  • self-report
  • proxy-report
  • quality-of-life
  • disability
  • ratings
  • populations
  • reliability
  • recovery
  • accuracy
  • lessons
  • profile


Dive into the research topics of 'Assessing Walking Limitations in Stroke Survivors: Are Self-Reports and Proxy-Reports Interchangeable?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this