Asthma natural history and diagnosis

Michael David Thomas; David Price

doi:10.1370/afm.40

Asthma natural history and diagnosis

Michael David Thomas, David Price

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

WinklerPrins presents data on the usefulness of symptoms and objective Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness (BHR) testing on subsequent respiratory consultations and diagnoses in a Dutch primary care cohort (1). The paper raises important points on the value of objective testing, but we feel a debate on the diagnosis of asthma is needed.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	110-115
Number of pages	5
Journal	Annals of Family Medicine
Volume	2
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1370/afm.40
Publication status	Published - 15 Apr 2004

Access to Document

10.1370/afm.40Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{37ac32274e5044ecb42c8b650fe22916,

title = "Asthma natural history and diagnosis",

abstract = "WinklerPrins presents data on the usefulness of symptoms and objective Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness (BHR) testing on subsequent respiratory consultations and diagnoses in a Dutch primary care cohort (1). The paper raises important points on the value of objective testing, but we feel a debate on the diagnosis of asthma is needed.",

author = "Thomas, {Michael David} and David Price",

year = "2004",

month = apr,

day = "15",

doi = "10.1370/afm.40",

language = "English",

volume = "2",

pages = "110--115",

journal = "Annals of Family Medicine",

issn = "1544-1709",

publisher = "Annals of Family Medicine, Inc",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Asthma natural history and diagnosis

AU - Thomas, Michael David

AU - Price, David

PY - 2004/4/15

Y1 - 2004/4/15

N2 - WinklerPrins presents data on the usefulness of symptoms and objective Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness (BHR) testing on subsequent respiratory consultations and diagnoses in a Dutch primary care cohort (1). The paper raises important points on the value of objective testing, but we feel a debate on the diagnosis of asthma is needed.

AB - WinklerPrins presents data on the usefulness of symptoms and objective Bronchial Hyperresponsiveness (BHR) testing on subsequent respiratory consultations and diagnoses in a Dutch primary care cohort (1). The paper raises important points on the value of objective testing, but we feel a debate on the diagnosis of asthma is needed.

U2 - 10.1370/afm.40

DO - 10.1370/afm.40

M3 - Letter

SN - 1544-1709

VL - 2

SP - 110

EP - 115

JO - Annals of Family Medicine

JF - Annals of Family Medicine

ER -

Asthma natural history and diagnosis

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this