Abstract
Joint focus of attention between two individuals can influence the way that observers attend, encode and value items. Using a non-predictive gaze cuing task we previously found that working memory (WM) was better for jointly attended (validly cued) versus invalidly cued coloured squares. Here we examine whether this influence of gaze on WM is driven by observers sharing the perspective of the face cue (mental state account), or simply by increased attention to the cued location (social attention account). To manipulate perspective-taking, a closed barrier obstructed the cue face’s view of the memoranda, while an open barrier allowed the cue face to ‘see’ the colours. A central cue face flanked by two identical barriers looked left or right, followed 500ms later by coloured squares for encoding which appeared equally often in the validly and invalidly cued locations. After a blank 1000ms maintenance interval, participants stated whether a probe colour was present or not in the preceding display. When the barrier was open, WM was significantly impaired for invalidly versus validly cued items. When the barrier was closed, the effect of gaze cues on WM was abolished. In contrast, further experiments showed a significant cuing effect on the speed of simple target localisation and colour discrimination regardless of barrier type. These findings support the mental state account of joint attention in WM, whereby the attentional focus of another alters WM via higher-level engagement with the second person perspective. A goal-specific model of perspective taking is proposed.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 795-806 |
Number of pages | 12 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory and Cognition |
Volume | 45 |
Issue number | 5 |
Early online date | 19 Jul 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 May 2019 |
Bibliographical note
The authors would like to thank the following undergraduate students for their help with some of the data collection in Experiments 1 and 3 and for their insightful discussion on some of the results found: Claire Bell, Vojtech Bily, Liliana Candeias de Sousa, Catherine Georgeson, Ann Hendy, Hana Nasser, Oluwanifemi Oni, Vilma Pullinen, Sophie Schenk, Gwen Schwab, Janika Vikman, Emily Wilks, and Charles Wilson. We also thank Dr Patric Bach for his useful comments on an earlier draft.Keywords
- Perspective taking
- joint attention
- gaze cueing
- working memory
- attention orienting
- Gaze cuing
- Attention orienting
- Joint attention
- Working memory
- perspective taking
- UNIQUE
- OBJECTS
- gaze cuing
- EYE-GAZE
- CUES