Abstract
OBJECTIVE: Comparing observed and expected distributions of baseline variables in randomized controlled trials (RCTs) has been used to investigate possible research misconduct, although the validity of this approach has been questioned. We explored this technique and introduced a novel metric to compare P values from baseline variables between treatment arms.
STUDY DESIGN AND SETTING: We compared observed with expected distributions of baseline P values using a one-way chi-square test and by comparing the area under the curve (AUC) of the cumulative distribution function in 13 RCTs conducted by our group, two groups of RCTs known to contain fabricated data, and simulations.
RESULTS: In our 13 RCTs, the distribution of P values from baseline continuous variables was consistent with the expected theoretical uniform distribution (P = 0.19, difference from expected AUC -0.03, 95% confidence interval [-0.04, 0.04]). For categorical variables, the P value distribution was not uniform. The distributions of P values from RCTs with fabricated data were highly unusual and not consistent with the uniform distribution for continuous variables, nor with the expected distribution for categorical variables, nor with the distribution of P values in genuine RCTs.
CONCLUSIONS: Assessing baseline P values in groups of RCTs can identify highly unusual distributions that might raise or reinforce concerns about randomization and data integrity.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 67-76 |
Number of pages | 10 |
Journal | Journal of Clinical Epidemiology |
Volume | 112 |
Early online date | 21 May 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Aug 2019 |
Bibliographical note
Funding: No specific funding was received for this study. M.B. receives salary support from the Health Research Council of New Zealand. The Health Services Research Unit is funded by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government Health and Social Care Directorates. The funders had no role in the study design; collection, analysis, and interpretation of the data; writing of the report; and in the decision to submit the paper for publication.Data access: The specific SAS code used to perform the analyses can be obtained by contacting the lead author (M.B.) by email.
Keywords
- Statistical methods
- Research integrity
- Fabricated data
- Data integrity
- P values
- Randomization
- STATISTICS
- NORMAL POSTMENOPAUSAL WOMEN
- HEALTHY
- DENSITY
- CALCIUM SUPPLEMENTATION
- ZOLEDRONATE
- THERAPY
- BONE
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'Baseline P value distributions in randomized trials were uniform for continuous but not categorical variables'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Alison Avenell
- School of Medicine, Medical Sciences & Nutrition, Health Services Research Unit (HSRU) - Clinical Chair in Health Services Research
- Institute of Applied Health Sciences
Person: Clinical Academic