Cardiovascular Testing in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Volume Recovery and Worldwide Comparison

Cole B. Hirschfeld, Sharmila Dorbala, Leslee J. Shaw, Todd C. Villines, Andrew D. Choi, Nathan Better, Rodrigo J. Cerci, Ganesan Karthikeyan, João V. Vitola, Michelle C. Williams, Mouaz Al-Mallah, Daniel S. Berman, Adam Bernheim, Robert W. Biederman, Paco E. Bravo, Matthew J. Budoff, Renee P. Bullock-Palmer, Marcus Y. Chen, Michael P. Dilorenzo, Rami DoukkyMaros Ferencik, Jeffrey B. Geske, Fadi G. Hage, Robert C. Hendel, Lynne Koweek, Venkatesh L. Murthy, Jagat Narula, Patricia F. Rodriguez Lozano, Nishant R. Shah, Amee Shah, Prem Soman, Randall C. Thompson, David Wolinsky, Yosef A. Cohen, Eli Malkovskiy, Michael J. Randazzo, Juan Lopez-Mattei, Purvi Parwani, Mrinali Shetty, Thomas N.B. Pascual, Yaroslav Pynda, Maurizio Dondi, Diana Paez, Andrew J. Einstein* (Corresponding Author), INCAPS COVID 2 Investigators Group

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Purpose: To characterize the recovery of diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes in U.S. and non-U.S. facilities in the year following the initial COVID-19 outbreak. 

Materials and Methods: The International Atomic Energy Agency (IAEA) coordinated a worldwide study called the IAEA Noninvasive Cardiology Protocols Study of COVID-19 2 (INCAPS COVID 2), collecting data from 669 facilities in 107 countries, including 93 facilities in 34 U.S. states, to determine the impact of the pandemic on diagnostic cardiovascular procedure volumes. Participants reported volumes for each diagnostic imaging modality used at their facility for March 2019 (baseline), April 2020, and April 2021. This secondary analysis of INCAPS COVID 2 evaluated differences in changes in procedure volume between U.S. and non-U.S. facilities and among U.S. regions. Factors associated with return to prepandemic volumes in the United States were also analyzed in a multivariable regression analysis.

 Results: Reduction in procedure volumes in April 2020 compared with baseline was similar for U.S. and non-U.S. facilities (−66% vs −71%, P =.27). U.S. facilities reported greater return to baseline in April 2021 than did all non-U.S. facilities (4% vs −6%, P =.008), but there was no evidence of a difference when comparing U.S. facilities with non-U.S. high-income country (NUHIC) facilities (4% vs 0%, P =.18). U.S. regional differences in return to baseline were observed between the Midwest (11%), Northeast (9%), South (1%), and West (−7%, P =.03), but no studied factors were significant predictors of 2021 change from prepandemic baseline. 

Conclusion: The reductions in cardiac testing during the early pandemic have recovered within a year to prepandemic baselines in the United States and NUHICs, while procedure volumes remain depressed in lower-income countries.

Original languageEnglish
Article numbere220288
Number of pages12
JournalRadiology: Cardiothoracic Imaging
Volume5
Issue number5
Early online date21 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
Study supported by the International Atomic Energy Agency. M.C.W. supported by the British Heart Foundation (grant no. FS/ICRF/20/26002)

Data Availability Statement

Supplemental material is available for this article.

Keywords

  • Angiography
  • Cardiac
  • Cardiac Testing
  • Cardiovascular Disease
  • Cardiovascular Imaging
  • COVID-19
  • CT
  • CT Angiography
  • Diagnostic Cardiovascular Procedure
  • Echocardiography
  • Epidemiology
  • MR Imaging
  • Radionuclide Studies
  • SPECT
  • SPECT/CT

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Cardiovascular Testing in the United States during the COVID-19 Pandemic: Volume Recovery and Worldwide Comparison'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this