Clinicians’ experiences in signposting an online mental health resource to expectant mothers: a qualitative study

Sofie Saxild, Philip Wilson, Sarah de Voss, Gritt Overbeck* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background
Poor maternal mental well-being and a lack of secure parent-infant attachment, have been identified as important factors associated with adverse mental health outcomes later in a child’s life. Interventions designed to care for maternal mental well-being during pregnancy and early parenthood, are therefore likely to support healthy child development. Mentalization is a skill parents can practice, improving the emotional bond to the child, offering insights into their own and the child’s mental states and potentially improving parental mental well-being. Most pregnant women in Denmark schedule antenatal consultations in general practice, potentially offering a solid platform to promote web-based interventions aiming to enhance mentalization skills. Signposting towards online resources has several advantages including high accessibility, ease of distribution and cost-effectiveness. We aimed to explore the attitudes and experiences of clinicians in general practice in signposting women towards a web-intervention to increase parental mentalization skills.

Methods
The intervention was offered to pregnant women at their primary preventive antenatal consultation in Danish general practice around week eight of pregnancy, and was designed to be incorporated into the following antenatal- and pediatric consultations until the child’s second birthday. Semi-structured interviews about clinicians’ experiences with signposting the intervention were conducted with 11 general practitioners (GP), three practice midwives (MW) and one practice nurse (NR).

Results
Clinicians wanted to enhance the focus on mental well-being in pregnancy and early childhood during preventive consultations. The main barriers to signposting the web-program were decreasing motivation over time, lack of financial viability and time limitations. Utilizing a psychoeducational web-intervention was generally accepted by clinicians, but ideally not carried out solely in general practice.

Conclusion
Signposting web-programs to improve parental mentalization skills can be welcomed by clinicians in general practice but need to be more tailored to suit the everyday workflow of the clinics. Addressing parental mentalization remains largely unchartered territory for pregnant women and clinicians alike, therefore training clinicians on the subject and its presentation should be offered.

Trial registration
The study is part of a larger project that has been approved by the Research Ethics Committee at the University of Copenhagen, Nov. 2019 (reference number 504–0111/19–5000).
Original languageEnglish
Article number336
Number of pages7
JournalBMC Pregnancy and Childbirth
Volume23
Issue number1
Early online date10 May 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 10 May 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
Authors are grateful to the clinicians assigned the 13 participating clinics for their time and participation in the interviews.
Funding
This work was funded by the TRYGfonden (grant number 125227) and the Capital Region of Denmark (grant number 19035774).

Keywords

  • Preventive care
  • Web-based intervention
  • General Practice
  • Mental Health
  • Pregnancy
  • Primary healthcare
  • Parent-Child Relation
  • Child development

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Clinicians’ experiences in signposting an online mental health resource to expectant mothers: a qualitative study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this