Comparative studies reveal variability in the use of tidal stream environments by seabirds

James J. Waggitt*, Alexandra M C Robbins, Helen M. Wade, Elizabeth A. Masden, Robert W. Furness, Angus C. Jackson, Beth E. Scott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

17 Citations (Scopus)


The global increase in tidal stream turbine installations creates a need to identify and mitigate any impacts on seabird populations. Within Scotland, UK, the vulnerability of black guillemots Cepphus grylle and European shags Phalacrocorax aristotelis is dependent on their tendency to exploit microhabitats characterised by fast mean horizontal current speeds (≥2 ms–1), and tidal states with maximum current speeds, within tidal stream environments. Identifying consistencies in their relative use of different microhabitats (fast versus slow mean horizontal current speeds) and tidal states (increasing/decreasing versus maximum currents) across these habitats could assist risk assessment and mitigation measures at both a regional and development site level. Datasets from shore-based surveys collated across 6 tidal stream environments showed that the probability of detecting foraging black guillemots and European shags tended to be higher in fast and slow microhabitats, respectively. However, differences between microhabitats were reversed and/or marginal in 3 out of the 5 sites used for each species. Differences between tidal states were almost always marginal. These variabilities show that a species’ vulnerability could differ greatly among development sites, and environmental impact assessments (EIA) must quantify habitat-use using dedicated and site-specific surveys to reduce uncertainty. However, a greater understanding of the mechanisms underlying variation in the use of tidal stream environments is needed when selecting a suite of potential development sites that reduce the possibility of population-level impacts. The current collection of physical and biological data across tidal stream environments could therefore prove invaluable for the protection of seabird populations.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)143-152
Number of pages10
JournalMarine Policy
Early online date28 Mar 2017
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jul 2017

Bibliographical note


This study was funded by a NERC Case studentship supported by OpenHydro Ltd and Marine Scotland Science (NE/J500148/1). Shore-based surveys were funded by NERC (NE/J004340/1) and Scottish Natural Heritage (SNH), and through the Marine Renewable Energy and the Environment (MaREE) project (funded by Highlands and Islands Enterprise, the European Regional Development Fund, and the Scottish Funding Council). We thank the following people for their assistance during shore-based surveys: Jenny Campbell, Adam Cockram, Mike Cockram, Louise Cockram, Mark Cockram, Kate Cockram, Ross McGregor, Karen Hall, Melissa Bruns, Kate Tyler, Lynn Thompson, Jim Nangle, William Simpson, Jo Robertson, Peter Jones, Fiona McGillivray, Helen Chance, Colin Williams, Suzanne Robinson. We also thank the North Yell Development Group, MeyGen, Natural Power, Peter Evans, Ian Davies, Pauline Goulet, Jan Hiddink, Leigh Howarth, Shaun Fraser, Zoe Mackay, Benjamin Williamson, Jeanette Zamon and several anonymous reviewers for their various contributions to this study.


  • Cepphus grylle
  • Environmental impact assessment
  • Marine renewable energy installations
  • Marine spatial planning
  • Phalacrocorax aristotelis
  • Shore-based survey


Dive into the research topics of 'Comparative studies reveal variability in the use of tidal stream environments by seabirds'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this