Deep anaesthesia and poor outcomes: the jury is still out

Helen F. Galley; Nigel R. Webster

doi:10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32465-1

Deep anaesthesia and poor outcomes: the jury is still out

Helen F. Galley^* (Corresponding Author), Nigel R. Webster

^*Corresponding author for this work

Applied Medicine

Research output: Contribution to journal › Comment/debate › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

3 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

The ideal anaesthetic depth is where the risk of operative recall or awareness is as low as possible, regardless of what is happening surgically, and where blood pressure and heart rate are kept optimal for the individual patient. Emergence from an appropriate level of anaesthesia should be prompt and uncomplicated, and without side-effects. To date, the norm has been for deeper anaesthesia, facilitated by modern short-acting drugs.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1881-1882
Number of pages	2
Journal	The Lancet
Volume	394
Issue number	10212
Early online date	20 Oct 2019
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32465-1
Publication status	Published - 23 Nov 2019

Access to Document

10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32465-1Licence: Unspecified

Lancet_Commentary_Galley_Webster_09_Oct_AAM
© 2019. This manuscript version is made available under the CC-BY-NC-ND 4.0 license http://creativecommons.org/licenses/by-nc-nd/4.0/
Accepted author manuscript, 53.5 KBLicence: CC BY-NC-ND

Cite this

@article{0335f4fd03e74f23a2410808b77d950f,

title = "Deep anaesthesia and poor outcomes: the jury is still out",

abstract = "The ideal anaesthetic depth is where the risk of operative recall or awareness is as low as possible, regardless of what is happening surgically, and where blood pressure and heart rate are kept optimal for the individual patient. Emergence from an appropriate level of anaesthesia should be prompt and uncomplicated, and without side-effects. To date, the norm has been for deeper anaesthesia, facilitated by modern short-acting drugs.",

author = "Galley, {Helen F.} and Webster, {Nigel R.}",

year = "2019",

month = nov,

day = "23",

doi = "10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32465-1",

language = "English",

volume = "394",

pages = "1881--1882",

journal = "The Lancet",

issn = "0140-6736",

publisher = "ACADEMIC PRESS INC ELSEVIER SCIENCE",

number = "10212",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Deep anaesthesia and poor outcomes

T2 - the jury is still out

AU - Galley, Helen F.

AU - Webster, Nigel R.

PY - 2019/11/23

Y1 - 2019/11/23

N2 - The ideal anaesthetic depth is where the risk of operative recall or awareness is as low as possible, regardless of what is happening surgically, and where blood pressure and heart rate are kept optimal for the individual patient. Emergence from an appropriate level of anaesthesia should be prompt and uncomplicated, and without side-effects. To date, the norm has been for deeper anaesthesia, facilitated by modern short-acting drugs.

AB - The ideal anaesthetic depth is where the risk of operative recall or awareness is as low as possible, regardless of what is happening surgically, and where blood pressure and heart rate are kept optimal for the individual patient. Emergence from an appropriate level of anaesthesia should be prompt and uncomplicated, and without side-effects. To date, the norm has been for deeper anaesthesia, facilitated by modern short-acting drugs.

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85075139203&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32465-1

DO - 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)32465-1

M3 - Comment/debate

C2 - 31645289

SN - 0140-6736

VL - 394

SP - 1881

EP - 1882

JO - The Lancet

JF - The Lancet

IS - 10212

ER -

Deep anaesthesia and poor outcomes: the jury is still out

Abstract

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this