Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR Reporting Checklist: A systematic methodology review

Natasha Hudek, Kelly Carroll, Seana Semchishen, Shelley Vanderhout, Justin Presseau, Jeremy M Grimshaw, Dean A Fergusson, Katie Gillies, Ian D Graham, Monica Taljaard, Jamie C Brehaut* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Background
Recruiting participants to clinical trials is an ongoing challenge, and relatively little is known about what recruitment strategies lead to better recruitment. Recruitment interventions can be considered complex interventions, often involving multiple components, targeting a variety of groups, and tailoring to different groups. We used the Template for Intervention Description and Replication (TIDieR) reporting checklist (which comprises 12 items recommended for reporting complex interventions) to guide the assessment of how recruitment interventions are described. We aimed to (1) examine to what extent we could identify information about each TIDieR item within recruitment intervention studies, and (2) observe additional detail for each item to describe useful variation among these studies.

Methods
We identified randomized, nested recruitment intervention studies providing recruitment or willingness to participate rates from two sources: a Cochrane review of trials evaluating strategies to improve recruitment to randomized trials, and the Online Resource for Research in Clinical triAls database. First, we assessed to what extent authors reported information about each TIDieR item. Second, we developed descriptive categorical variables for 7 TIDieR items and extracting relevant quotes for the other 5 items.

Results
We assessed 122 recruitment intervention studies. We were able to extract information relevant to most TIDieR items (e.g., brief rationale, materials, procedure) with the exception of a few items that were only rarely reported (e.g., tailoring, modifications, planned/actual fidelity). The descriptive variables provided a useful overview of study characteristics, with most studies using various forms of informational interventions (55%) delivered at a single time point (90%), often by a member of the research team (59%) in a clinical care setting (41%).

Conclusions
Our TIDieR-based variables provide a useful description of the core elements of complex trial recruitment interventions. Recruitment intervention studies report core elements of complex interventions variably; some process elements (e.g., mode of delivery, location) are almost always described, while others (e.g., duration, fidelity) are reported infrequently, with little indication of a reason for their absence. Future research should explore whether these TIDieR-based variables can form the basis of an approach to better reporting of elements of successful recruitment interventions.
Original languageEnglish
Article number85
Number of pages16
JournalBMC Medical Research Methodology
Volume24
Issue number1
Early online date8 Apr 2024
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 8 Apr 2024

Keywords

  • Reporting
  • Recruitment interventions
  • Systematic review
  • Methodology review

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Describing the content of trial recruitment interventions using the TIDieR Reporting Checklist: A systematic methodology review'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this