Abstract
The study of post-conflict justice and peace incorporates ideas from many disciplines and on a range of topics including justice, reconciliation, democratization, and peace. While diversity is valuable, it can also lead to confusion in theory and practice and so requires close evaluation of how diverse ideas interact, and to what end. This paper begins the systematic examination of such interactions by using new bibliometric software to track citations between two particularly influential literatures contributing to post-conflict theory; the legal and the psychosocial. The paper describes how these traditions interact and the impact on the post-conflict literature as a whole.
| Original language | English |
|---|---|
| Pages (from-to) | 302-320 |
| Number of pages | 19 |
| Journal | Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding |
| Volume | 10 |
| Issue number | 3 |
| Early online date | 18 Jul 2016 |
| DOIs | |
| Publication status | Published - 2016 |
Keywords
- Peacebuilding
- Transitional Justice
- Intergroup reconciliation
- Citation Analysis
- Interdisciplinarity
- Bibliometric Analysis
Access to Document
- Disciplinary Divides in Post-Conflict Justice and Peace - Accepted version
This is an Accepted Manuscript of an article published by Taylor & Francis in Journal of Intervention and Statebuilding on 18th July 2016, available online: http://www.tandfonline.com/10.1080/17502977.2016.1199481