Abstract
Three studies integrated crossed-categorization and discrete emotion approaches to prejudice and prejudice reduction. Study 1 made salient crossed-categorization using naturally occurring groups and examined the ability of emotions to account for prejudiced evaluations. Study 2 constructed novel crossed-categorizations in the laboratory to examine the role of appraisal-based emotions in evaluations of crossed-categories. Study 3 crossed gender and sexual orientation, for which elicited discrete emotions predict different evaluative responses than do shared and unshared group memberships alone. In all three studies, discrete emotions were able to account for the effects of crossed-categorization on evaluative measures of prejudice and revealed emotional paths to prejudice reduction which would be obscured by the evaluative measures alone. In Study 3, a discrete emotions approach better predicted evaluations than did shared and unshared group membership alone. These results converge to highlight the importance of discrete emotions in understanding the evaluative implications of crossed-categorization, especially for prejudice reduction. (C) 2011 Elsevier Inc. All rights reserved.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 55-69 |
Number of pages | 15 |
Journal | Journal of Experimental Social Psychology |
Volume | 48 |
Issue number | 1 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Jan 2012 |
Keywords
- crossed-caregorisation
- prejudice
- prejudice reduction
- intergroup relations
- emotion
- discrete emotion