Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory

M D Rugg, R E Mark, P Walla, A M Schloerscheidt, Stephen Birch, Kevin Allan

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

614 Citations (Scopus)


One presentation of a word to a subject is enough to change the way in which the word is processed subsequently, even when there is no conscious (explicit) memory of the original presentation. This phenomenon is known as implicit memory. The neural correlates of implicit memory have been studied previously, but they have never been compared with the correlates of explicit memory while holding task conditions constant or while using a procedure that ensured that the neural correlates were not 'contaminated' by explicit memory. Here we use scalp-recorded event-related brain potentials to identify neural activity associated with implicit and explicit memory during the performance of a recognition memory task. Relative to new words, recently studied words produced activity in three neuroanatomically and functionally dissociable neural populations. One of these populations was activated whether or not the word was consciously recognized, and its activity therefore represents a neural correlate of implicit memory. Thus, when task and memory contamination effects are eliminated, the neural correlates of explicit and implicit memory differ qualitatively.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)595-598
Number of pages4
Issue number6676
Publication statusPublished - 9 Apr 1998


  • Adult
  • Brain Mapping
  • Evoked Potentials
  • Humans
  • Learning
  • Memory
  • Neurons
  • Vocabulary


Dive into the research topics of 'Dissociation of the neural correlates of implicit and explicit memory'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this