Effect of intercropping distance on crop yield in a paulownia-wheat agroforestry system in the huang-huai-hai plain, china

Wu Gang*, Zhou Zhongxuan, Martin Barker, Yang Xiu, Kong Hongmei, Zhao Jingzhu

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

A case study in a Paulownia (Paulownia elongata S. Y. Hu) -wheat intercropping system was conducted, and the relationship between tree belt distance (D), intercropping age (A) and annual relative wheat yield (Y) was estimated. The regression equation can be expressed as Y= 90.3290—1.9982 A+ 1.1924 D—0.3349 A2+ 0.2910 AD-0.0032 AD2. Tree belt distance and intercropping tree age were the main factors influencing wheat yield. Optimized tree belt distance in each intercropping tree age within the rotation for maximum annual yield was expressed as Dm= 29.1496 + 2.6886 A. The optimized tree belt distance for different Paulownia rotation (T), which could cause the maximum accumulative average wheat yield, was shown as: Dm' = 0.600 + 11.042 T-0.787 T2+ 0.0273 T3 Further work is needed to develop a system to optimize the combined tree and wheat yields to meet the farmers' requirements.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)7-16
Number of pages10
JournalForests Trees and Livelihoods
Volume13
Issue number1
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 2003

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
The study was supported by the National Natural Science Foundation of China (No: 39970591 and 39870132). Special thanks go to Prof. Li Wenhua from the Commission for Integrated Survey of Natural Resources, Chinese Academy of Sciences (CAS) and Prof. Wang Qingli from the Institute of Applied Ecology, CAS for their editorial comments.

Keywords

  • China
  • Crown diameter
  • Intercropping system
  • Paulownia elongata
  • Rotation
  • Tree height
  • Wheat yield

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Effect of intercropping distance on crop yield in a paulownia-wheat agroforestry system in the huang-huai-hai plain, china'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this