Electrical brain responses reveal sequential constraints on planning during music performance

Brian Mathias, William J Gehring, Caroline Palmer

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

9 Citations (Scopus)


Elements in speech and music unfold sequentially over time. To produce sentences and melodies quickly and accurately, individuals must plan upcoming sequence events, as well as monitor outcomes via auditory feedback. We investigated the neural correlates of sequential planning and monitoring processes by manipulating auditory feedback during music performance. Pianists performed isochronous melodies from memory at an initially cued rate while their electroencephalogram was recorded. Pitch feedback was occasionally altered to match either an immediately upcoming Near-Future pitch (next sequence event) or a more distant Far-Future pitch (two events ahead of the current event). Near-Future, but not Far-Future altered feedback perturbed the timing of pianists' performances, suggesting greater interference of Near-Future sequential events with current planning processes. Near-Future feedback triggered a greater reduction in auditory sensory suppression (enhanced response) than Far-Future feedback, reflected in the P2 component elicited by the pitch event following the unexpected pitch change. Greater timing perturbations were associated with enhanced cortical sensory processing of the pitch event following the Near-Future altered feedback. Both types of feedback alterations elicited feedback-related negativity (FRN) and P3a potentials and amplified spectral power in the theta frequency range. These findings suggest similar constraints on producers' sequential planning to those reported in speech production.

Original languageEnglish
Number of pages21
JournalBrain Sciences
Issue number2
Publication statusPublished - 28 Jan 2019

Bibliographical note

Funding: National Science Foundation Graduate Research Fellowship to B.M. Canada Research Chairs grant and
Natural Sciences and Engineering Research Council of Canada grant 298173 to C.P.
Acknowledgments: We thank Pierre Gianferrara, Erik Koopmans, and Frances Spidle of the Sequence Production
Lab for their assistance.
Conflicts of Interest: The authors declare no conflict of interest. The funding sponsors had no role in the design
of the study; in the collection, analyses, or interpretation of data; in the writing of the manuscript, and in the
decision to publish the results


Dive into the research topics of 'Electrical brain responses reveal sequential constraints on planning during music performance'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this