Abstract
The environmental benefits from Payment for Ecosystem Services (PES) schemes can often be enhanced if private land managers are induced to enrol land in a spatially coordinated manner. One incentive mechanism which has been proposed to achieve such spatial coordination is the agglomeration bonus, a two-part payment scheme which offers a pecuniary (financial) reward for decisions that lead to greater spatial coordination of enrolled land. However, farmers respond to a range of motives when deciding whether to participate in such schemes, including non-pecuniary motives such as a concern for the environment or social comparisons. This study implements a de-contextualised laboratory experiment to test the effectiveness of the agglomeration bonus when non-pecuniary motives are explicitly incorporated into the decision-making environment. We capture intrinsic preferences for the public good dimension of environmental improvement through a real donation to environmental charities and examine the relative impact of a group-ranking nudge. The experimental results show that the agglomeration bonus does indeed improve participation and spatial coordination when non-pecuniary motives are accounted for, but that its performance is not enhanced by the nudge.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 107271 |
Number of pages | 14 |
Journal | Ecological Economics |
Volume | 192 |
Early online date | 12 Nov 2021 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - 1 Feb 2022 |
Bibliographical note
AcknowledgmentsThe authors are grateful to Simanti Banerjee, Tim Cason and participants at the Manchester Environmental Economics Workshop (May 2017), at the REECAP workshop (September 2018) and INRAE UMR Economie Publique seminar (2021) for their feedback and valuable suggestions on this work, Jean-Marc Rousselle for his help in running the laboratory experiment and the LEE-M team. Laure Kuhfuss acknowledges support from the Scottish Government Research programme, RESAS 1.4.3, in the writing up of the paper. Nick Hanley and Frans de Vries acknowledge support from the Marine Alliance for Science and Technology for Scotland (MASTS) pooling initiative. MASTS is funded by the Scottish Funding Council (grant reference HR09011) and contributing institutions. This research was partly funded by the European Commission as part of the EFFECT project (817903) under the Horizon 2020 scheme.
Keywords
- Spatial Coordination
- agglomeration bonus
- coordination games
- nudge
- social comparison
- laboratory experiments
- environmental preferences