Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions

Gloria Alvarez, Saadia Bhatty, Nikos Lavranos*, Alexander Leventhal

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paperDiscussion paper


EFILA believes that an effective enforcement regime is paramount to the success of any eventual Multilateral Investment Court (“MIC”) (if such a MIC should come into being upon the recommendation of the Working Group).
Because it believes that MIC decisions should not be subject to any enforcement gap (which may threaten the legitimacy of the ISDS system), EFILA remains skeptical that the New York Convention would be an effective short-term stopgap pending conclusion of a specific MIC enforcement regime.
Original languageEnglish
Number of pages15
Publication statusPublished - 2020


Dive into the research topics of 'Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this