Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions

Gloria Alvarez; Saadia Bhatty; Nikos  Lavranos; Alexander  Leventhal

Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions

Gloria Alvarez, Saadia Bhatty, Nikos Lavranos^*, Alexander Leventhal

^*Corresponding author for this work

Law

Research output: Working paper › Discussion paper

Abstract

EFILA believes that an effective enforcement regime is paramount to the success of any eventual Multilateral Investment Court (“MIC”) (if such a MIC should come into being upon the recommendation of the Working Group).
Because it believes that MIC decisions should not be subject to any enforcement gap (which may threaten the legitimacy of the ISDS system), EFILA remains skeptical that the New York Convention would be an effective short-term stopgap pending conclusion of a specific MIC enforcement regime.

Original language	English
Number of pages	15
Publication status	Published - 2020

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

https://efila.org/annual-conference-2020/Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@techreport{b6245752bfb14d0d94e5b0270d653555,

title = "Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions",

abstract = "EFILA believes that an effective enforcement regime is paramount to the success of any eventual Multilateral Investment Court (“MIC”) (if such a MIC should come into being upon the recommendation of the Working Group).Because it believes that MIC decisions should not be subject to any enforcement gap (which may threaten the legitimacy of the ISDS system), EFILA remains skeptical that the New York Convention would be an effective short-term stopgap pending conclusion of a specific MIC enforcement regime.",

author = "Gloria Alvarez and Saadia Bhatty and Nikos Lavranos and Alexander Leventhal",

year = "2020",

language = "English",

type = "WorkingPaper",

}

TY - UNPB

T1 - Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions

AU - Alvarez, Gloria

AU - Bhatty, Saadia

AU - Lavranos, Nikos

AU - Leventhal, Alexander

PY - 2020

Y1 - 2020

N2 - EFILA believes that an effective enforcement regime is paramount to the success of any eventual Multilateral Investment Court (“MIC”) (if such a MIC should come into being upon the recommendation of the Working Group).Because it believes that MIC decisions should not be subject to any enforcement gap (which may threaten the legitimacy of the ISDS system), EFILA remains skeptical that the New York Convention would be an effective short-term stopgap pending conclusion of a specific MIC enforcement regime.

AB - EFILA believes that an effective enforcement regime is paramount to the success of any eventual Multilateral Investment Court (“MIC”) (if such a MIC should come into being upon the recommendation of the Working Group).Because it believes that MIC decisions should not be subject to any enforcement gap (which may threaten the legitimacy of the ISDS system), EFILA remains skeptical that the New York Convention would be an effective short-term stopgap pending conclusion of a specific MIC enforcement regime.

M3 - Discussion paper

BT - Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions

ER -

Ensuring the Effective Recognition and Enforcement of MIC Decisions

Abstract

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this