Fixed Points for Consequence Relations

Toby Meadows

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

14 Citations (Scopus)
9 Downloads (Pure)


This paper provides a way of dealing with paradoxes associated with consequence relations via a generalisation of Kripke’s fixed point technique. In particular, we focus on Beall and Murzi’s paradox, although the framework outlined should have more general application. We first attempt to locate this problem among the existing corpus of semantic paradoxes. We then examine two canonical approaches to the issue and conclude with an inductive construction which, in some fashion, goes beyond those approaches.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)333-357
Number of pages25
JournalLogique et Analyse
Issue number227
Publication statusPublished - 2014


Dive into the research topics of 'Fixed Points for Consequence Relations'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this