Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios

Roslyn C. Henry; Almut Arneth; Martin Jung; Sam S. Rabin; Mark D. Rounsevell; Frances Warren; Peter Alexander

doi:10.1038/s41893-021-00844-x

Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios

Roslyn C. Henry^*, Almut Arneth, Martin Jung, Sam S. Rabin, Mark D. Rounsevell, Frances Warren, Peter Alexander

^*Corresponding author for this work

Aberdeen Centre For Environmental Sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

19 Citations (Scopus)

39 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Global biodiversity is rapidly declining, and goals to halt biodiversity loss, such as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, have not been achieved. To avoid further biodiversity loss, area-based protection will form part of new biodiversity targets. We use a state-of-the-art global land-use model, the Land System Modular Model, to explore global and regional human health and food security outcomes under strictly enforced 30% and 50% land protection scenarios. We find protection scenarios cause additional human mortality due to diet- and weight-related changes. Low-income regions such as South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa experience the highest levels of underweight-related mortality, causing an additional 200,000 deaths related to malnutrition in these regions alone. High-income regions, by contrast, are less affected by protection measures. Our results highlight that radical measures to protect areas of biodiversity value may jeopardize food security and human health in the most vulnerable regions of the world.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	303-310
Number of pages	7
Journal	Nature Sustainability
Volume	5
Early online date	3 Feb 2022
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1038/s41893-021-00844-x
Publication status	Published - 1 Apr 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
R.C.H., F.W. and P.A. were supported by the UK’s Global Food Security Programme project Resilience of the UK food system to Global Shocks (RUGS, BB/N020707/1). M.J. acknowledges funding from the Nature Map project through Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI). A.A. and M.D.R. acknowledge support through the Helmholtz Association. S.S.R. acknowledges support by the BMBF Germany/ISIPEDIA project. We thank P. Visconti for cross reading the manuscript and contributing to the discussion of the results.

Data Availability Statement

The LandSyMM output data used in this study are available through Zenodo (https://doi.org/10.5281/zenodo.5749706). Food consumption data were accessed through FAOSTAT (https://www.fao.org/faostat/en/);. BMI data were accessed through the WHO global health observatory database (https://www.who.int/gho/database/en/). Disease and mortality data were accessed through the global health data exchange (http://ghdx.healthdata.org/gbd-results-tool). LandSyMM model code is available on request from the authors.

Keywords

conservation biology
DISEASES
Risk Factors
sustainability

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1038/s41893-021-00844-xLicence: Unspecified

Henry_etal_NS_Global_And_Regional_AAMAccepted author manuscript, 708 KBLicence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{6f111de6b553485ca9c7cdd6fd9df53b,

title = "Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios",

abstract = "Global biodiversity is rapidly declining, and goals to halt biodiversity loss, such as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, have not been achieved. To avoid further biodiversity loss, area-based protection will form part of new biodiversity targets. We use a state-of-the-art global land-use model, the Land System Modular Model, to explore global and regional human health and food security outcomes under strictly enforced 30% and 50% land protection scenarios. We find protection scenarios cause additional human mortality due to diet- and weight-related changes. Low-income regions such as South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa experience the highest levels of underweight-related mortality, causing an additional 200,000 deaths related to malnutrition in these regions alone. High-income regions, by contrast, are less affected by protection measures. Our results highlight that radical measures to protect areas of biodiversity value may jeopardize food security and human health in the most vulnerable regions of the world.",

keywords = "conservation biology, DISEASES, Risk Factors, sustainability",

author = "Henry, {Roslyn C.} and Almut Arneth and Martin Jung and Rabin, {Sam S.} and Rounsevell, {Mark D.} and Frances Warren and Peter Alexander",

note = "Funding Information: R.C.H., F.W. and P.A. were supported by the UK{\textquoteright}s Global Food Security Programme project Resilience of the UK food system to Global Shocks (RUGS, BB/N020707/1). M.J. acknowledges funding from the Nature Map project through Norway{\textquoteright}s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI). A.A. and M.D.R. acknowledge support through the Helmholtz Association. S.S.R. acknowledges support by the BMBF Germany/ISIPEDIA project. We thank P. Visconti for cross reading the manuscript and contributing to the discussion of the results. ",

year = "2022",

month = apr,

day = "1",

doi = "10.1038/s41893-021-00844-x",

language = "English",

volume = "5",

pages = "303--310",

journal = "Nature Sustainability",

issn = "2398-9629",

publisher = "Springer Nature",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios

AU - Henry, Roslyn C.

AU - Arneth, Almut

AU - Jung, Martin

AU - Rabin, Sam S.

AU - Rounsevell, Mark D.

AU - Warren, Frances

AU - Alexander, Peter

N1 - Funding Information: R.C.H., F.W. and P.A. were supported by the UK’s Global Food Security Programme project Resilience of the UK food system to Global Shocks (RUGS, BB/N020707/1). M.J. acknowledges funding from the Nature Map project through Norway’s International Climate and Forest Initiative (NICFI). A.A. and M.D.R. acknowledge support through the Helmholtz Association. S.S.R. acknowledges support by the BMBF Germany/ISIPEDIA project. We thank P. Visconti for cross reading the manuscript and contributing to the discussion of the results.

PY - 2022/4/1

Y1 - 2022/4/1

N2 - Global biodiversity is rapidly declining, and goals to halt biodiversity loss, such as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, have not been achieved. To avoid further biodiversity loss, area-based protection will form part of new biodiversity targets. We use a state-of-the-art global land-use model, the Land System Modular Model, to explore global and regional human health and food security outcomes under strictly enforced 30% and 50% land protection scenarios. We find protection scenarios cause additional human mortality due to diet- and weight-related changes. Low-income regions such as South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa experience the highest levels of underweight-related mortality, causing an additional 200,000 deaths related to malnutrition in these regions alone. High-income regions, by contrast, are less affected by protection measures. Our results highlight that radical measures to protect areas of biodiversity value may jeopardize food security and human health in the most vulnerable regions of the world.

AB - Global biodiversity is rapidly declining, and goals to halt biodiversity loss, such as the Aichi Biodiversity Targets, have not been achieved. To avoid further biodiversity loss, area-based protection will form part of new biodiversity targets. We use a state-of-the-art global land-use model, the Land System Modular Model, to explore global and regional human health and food security outcomes under strictly enforced 30% and 50% land protection scenarios. We find protection scenarios cause additional human mortality due to diet- and weight-related changes. Low-income regions such as South Asia and sub-Saharan Africa experience the highest levels of underweight-related mortality, causing an additional 200,000 deaths related to malnutrition in these regions alone. High-income regions, by contrast, are less affected by protection measures. Our results highlight that radical measures to protect areas of biodiversity value may jeopardize food security and human health in the most vulnerable regions of the world.

KW - conservation biology

KW - DISEASES

KW - Risk Factors

KW - sustainability

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85124153390&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1038/s41893-021-00844-x

DO - 10.1038/s41893-021-00844-x

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:85124153390

SN - 2398-9629

VL - 5

SP - 303

EP - 310

JO - Nature Sustainability

JF - Nature Sustainability

ER -

Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Data Availability Statement

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Data from: Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios.

Cite this

Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Data Availability Statement

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Datasets

Data from: Global and regional health and food security under strict conservation scenarios.

Cite this