Interceptive timing (IntT) is a fundamental ability underpinning numerous actions (e.g. ball catching), but its development and relationship with other cognitive functions remains poorly understood. Piaget (1955) suggested that children need to learn the physical rules that govern their environment before they can represent abstract concepts such as number and time. Thus, learning how objects move in space and time may underpin the development of related abstract representations (i.e. mathematics). To test this hypothesis, we captured objective measures of IntT in 309 primary school children (4-11 years), alongside ‘general motor skill’ and ‘national standardized academic attainment’ scores. Bayesian estimation showed that IntT (but not general motor capability) uniquely predicted mathematical ability even after controlling for age, reading and writing attainment. This finding highlights that interceptive timing is distinct from other motor skills with specificity in predicting childhood mathematical ability independent of other forms of attainment and motor capability.
The development of the bespoke manipulandum was outsourced to ReSolve Research Engineering (http://www.resolve-re.co.uk). Thanks to Katie Mooney and Joyti Panesar for help with data collection and producing a figure and to Ed Berry for help with coordination of data collection and planning. Thanks to all the undergraduate students involved in data collection. Special thanks to the SHINE schools for enabling us to conduct this research.
K. A. Shire, L. J. B. Hill, A. Waterman, and M. Mon-Williams were funded by the National Institute for Health Research (NIHR) Collaboration for Leadership in Applied Health Research and Care (CLARHC) Yorkshire and Humber (www
.clahrc-yh.nihr.ac.uk). The views expressed are those of the author(s) and not necessarily those of the NHS, the NIHR, or the Department of Health and Social Care.
- Interceptive Timing
- Fine motor
- gross motor
- educational neuroscience
- open data