How (not) to sentence rape of a “particularly vulnerable” victim: a critical examination of the Crown appeal against sentence in HM Advocate v MG — Part 2: recent developments in sentencing rape

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

Abstract

In the second of a series of four articles on the Crown appeal against sentence in HM Advocate v MG [2023] HCJAC 3; 2023 J.C. 68; 2023 S.L.T. 232; 2023 S.C.C.R. 97, the author considers previous domestic authority on the range of sentences appropriate for cases of rape. Given the appeal court’s reference in MG to the English guidelines on sentencing rape as a form of comparator, or cross-check, on the sentence imposed by the trial judge, the article examines the operation of these guidelines. The article concludes by reviewing domestic authority on the use of the English guidelines as a cross-check on sentences imposed by the Scottish courts.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)173-182
Number of pages10
JournalScots Law Times
Issue number35
Early online date10 Nov 2023
Publication statusPublished - 10 Nov 2023

Keywords

  • Intoxication
  • Rape
  • Scotland
  • Scottish Sentencing Council
  • Sentencing Council for England and Wales
  • Sentencing guidelines
  • Undue leniency

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'How (not) to sentence rape of a “particularly vulnerable” victim: a critical examination of the Crown appeal against sentence in HM Advocate v MG — Part 2: recent developments in sentencing rape'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this