How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction.

S Lev-Ari, Zeshu Shao

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)


People learn language from their social environment. As individuals differ in their social networks, they might be exposed to input with different lexical distributions, and these might influence their linguistic representations and lexical choices. In this article we test the relation between linguistic performance and 3 social network properties that should influence input variability, namely, network size, network heterogeneity, and network density. In particular, we examine how these social network properties influence lexical prediction, lexical access, and lexical use. To do so, in Study 1, participants predicted how people of different ages would name pictures, and in Study 2 participants named the pictures themselves. In both studies, we examined how participants’ social network properties related to their performance. In Study 3, we ran simulations on norms we collected to see how age variability in one’s network influences the distribution of different names in the input. In all studies, network age heterogeneity influenced performance leading to better prediction, faster response times for difficult-to-name items, and less entropy in input distribution. These results suggest that individual differences in social network properties can influence linguistic behavior. Specifically, they show that having a more heterogeneous network is associated with better performance. These results also show that the same factors influence lexical prediction and lexical production, suggesting the two might be related.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)528-538
JournalMemory & Cognition
Issue number3
Publication statusPublished - 2016

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments: Open access funding provided by Max Planck Society.


Dive into the research topics of 'How social network heterogeneity facilitates lexical access and lexical prediction.'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this