Abstract
What is the relationship between Frege's puzzle and the puzzle of the de se? An increasingly influential view claims that the de se puzzle is merely an instance of Frege's puzzle and that the idea that de se attitudes pose a distinctive theoretical challenge rests on a myth. Here we argue that this view is misguided. There are important dierences between the two puzzles. First, unlike Frege puzzle cases, de se puzzle cases involve unshareable Fregean senses. Second, unlike Frege puzzle cases, de se puzzle cases cannot be resolved by objective information alone. Further, there seem to be pure cases of each puzzle: instances of the de se puzzle which do not have a Fregean structure, and instances of Frege's puzzle, which do not involve de se attitudes. We conclude that the two puzzles are fundamentally dierent and that the traditional theory of attitudes needs to be amended.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 1-27 |
Journal | Inquiry (United Kingdom) |
Volume | 0 |
Early online date | 9 Dec 2019 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 9 Dec 2019 |
Keywords
- mental content
- Frege's puzzle
- indexicality
- de se attitudes
- propositional attitudes
Fingerprint
Dive into the research topics of 'De Se Puzzles and Frege Puzzles'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.Profiles
-
Stephan Torre
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Centre for Knowledge and Society (CEKAS)
- School of Divinity, History & Philosophy, Philosophy - Senior Lecturer
Person: Academic