Identifying and prioritising future interventions with stakeholders to improve paediatric urgent care pathways in Scotland, UK: a mixed-methods study

Emma King* (Corresponding Author), Emma France, Cari Malcolm, Sachin Kumar, Smita Dick, Richard G Kyle, Philip Wilson, Lorna Aucott, Steve Turner, Pat Hoddinott

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
1 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Objectives
To identify and prioritise interventions, from the perspectives of parents and health professionals, which may be alternatives to current unscheduled paediatric urgent care pathways.

Design
FLAMINGO (FLow of AdMissions in chIldren and youNG peOple) is a sequential mixed-methods study, with public and patient involvement (PPI) throughout. Data linkage for urgent admissions and three referral sources: emergency department, out of hours service and general practice, was followed by qualitative interviews with parents and professionals. Findings were presented and discussed at a stakeholder intervention prioritisation event.

Participants
Quantitative data: children with urgent medical admission to hospital from 2015 to 2017. Qualitative interviews: parents and health professionals with experiences of urgent short stay hospital admissions of children. PPI engagement was conducted with nine parent–toddler groups and a university-based PPI advisory group. Stakeholder event: parents, health professionals and representatives from Scottish Government, academia, charities and PPI attended.

Results
Data for 171 039 admissions which included 92 229 short stay admissions were analysed and 48 health professionals and 21 parents were interviewed. The stakeholder event included 7 parents, 12 health professionals and 28 other stakeholders. Analysis and synthesis of all data identified seven interventions which were prioritised at the stakeholder event: (1) addressing gaps in acute paediatric skills of health professionals working in community settings; (2) assessment and observation of acutely unwell children in community settings; (3) creation of holistic children’s ‘hubs’; (4) adoption of ‘hospital at home’ models; and three specialised care pathways for subgroups of children; (5) convulsions; (6) being aged <2 years old; and (7) wheeze/bronchiolitis. Stakeholders prioritised interventions 1, 2 and 3; these could be combined into a whole population intervention. Barriers to progressing these include resources, staffing and rurality.

Conclusions
Health professionals and families want future interventions that are patient-centred, community-based and aligned to outcomes that matter to them.
Original languageEnglish
Article numbere074141
Number of pages12
JournalBMJ Open
Volume13
Issue number10
Early online date12 Oct 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 12 Oct 2023

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgments
Amy Woodhouse of Children in Scotland registered charity critically reviewed and commented on drafts of this manuscript. We are grateful for Dave Kelly at Albasoft for providing primary care data. We are grateful to Rebecca Fairnie at Electronic Data Research and Innovation Service for managing our access to all data. The authors would like to extend our thanks to the parents and health professionals who participated in this study, and to the stakeholders who participated in both public and patient involvement activities and the engagement and prioritisation event.
Funding :This work was supported by the Chief Scientist Office of the Scottish Government, grant number HIPS/18/09

Keywords

  • Urgent care
  • paediatrics
  • Patient and Public Involvement
  • short stay admission
  • qualitative
  • mixed methods

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Identifying and prioritising future interventions with stakeholders to improve paediatric urgent care pathways in Scotland, UK: a mixed-methods study'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this