Abstract
Objective: To investigate the impact of pre-biologic impairment on meeting domain-specific biologic responder definitions in adults with severe asthma.
Methods: This was a longitudinal, cohort study across 22 countries participating in the International Severe Asthma Registry (https://isaregistries.org/) from May 2017 to January 2023. Change in four asthma domains (exacerbation rate, asthma control, long-term oral corticosteroid [LTOCS] dose, and lung function) was assessed from biologic initiation to one year post-treatment (minimum 24 weeks). Pre- to post-biologic changes for responders and non-responders were described along a categorical gradient for each domain derived from pre-biologic distributions (exacerbation rate: 0 to 6+/year; asthma control: well-controlled to uncontrolled; LTOCS: 0 to >30 mg/day; ppFEV1: <50 to ≥80%).
Results: Percentage of biologic responders (i.e., those with a category improvement pre- to post-biologic) varied by domain and increased with greater pre-biologic impairment, increasing from 70.2 to 90.0% for exacerbation rate, 46.3 to 52.3% for asthma control, 31.1 to 58.5% for LTOCS daily dose, and 35.8 to 50.6% for ppFEV1. The proportion of patients showing improvement post-biologic tended to be greater for anti–IL-5/5R compared to anti-IgE for exacerbation, asthma control, and ppFEV1 domains, irrespective of pre-biologic impairment.
Conclusion: Our results provide realistic outcome-specific post-biologic expectations for both physicians and patients, will be foundational to inform future work on a multi-dimensional approach to define and assess biologic responders and response, and may enhance appropriate patient selection for biologic therapies.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Journal | Annals of Allergy, Asthma, and Immunology |
Early online date | 25 Dec 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 25 Dec 2023 |
Bibliographical note
The authors acknowledge Mr Aivaras Cepelis for his contribution during the development of the manuscript. The authors thank Ms Pui Yee Lai (M.A.), of the Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI), and Ms Andrea Lim (BSc, Hons) of the Observational Pragmatic Research Institute (OPRI) for their editorial and formatting assistance that supported the development of this publication.This study was conducted by the Observational and Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd and was partially funded by Optimum Patient Care Global and AstraZeneca Ltd. No funding was received by the Observational & Pragmatic Research Institute Pte Ltd for its contribution.
Open Access via the Elsevier/University of Aberdeen agreement
Data Availability Statement
The ISAR database has ethical approval from the Anonymous Data Ethics Protocols and Transparency (ADEPT) committee (ADEPT0218) and is registered with the European Union Electronic Register of Post-Authorization studies (ENCEPP/DSPP/23720). The study was designed, implemented, and reported in compliance with the European Network Centres for Pharmacoepidemiology and Pharmacovigilance (ENCEPP) Code of Conduct (EUPAS38288) and with all applicable local and international laws and regulation, and registered with ENCEPP (https://www.encepp.eu/encepp/viewResource.htm?id=38289). Governance was provided by ADEPT (registration number: ADEPT1220).Supplementary data related to this article can be found at https://doi.org/10.1016/j.anai.2023.12.023.
Keywords
- anti-IgE
- anti–IL-5
- anti–IL-4/13
- control
- exacerbation
- FEV
- oral corticosteroid