In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries

Charles A. Dorison*, Jennifer S. Lerner, Blake H. Heller, Alexander J. Rothman, Ichiro I. Kawachi, Ke Wang, Vaughan W. Rees, Brian P. Gill, Nancy Gibbs, Charles R. Ebersole, Zahir Vally, Zuzanna Tajchman, Andras N. Zsido, Mija Zrimsek, Zhang Chen, Ignazio Ziano, Zoi Gialitaki, Chris D. Ceary, Yijun Lin, Yoshihiko KunisatoYuki Yamada, Qinyu Xiao, Xiaoming Jiang, Xinkai Du, Elvin Yao, John Paul Wilson, Wilson Cyrus-Lai, William Jimenez-Leal, Wilbert Law, W. Matthew Collins, Karley L. Richard, Marek Vranka, Vladislav Ankushev, Vidar Schei, Valerija Križanić, Veselina Hristova Kadreva, Vera Cubela Adoric, Ulrich S. Tran, Siu Kit Yeung, Widad Hassan, Ralph Houston, Tiago J.S. Lima, Thomas Ostermann, Thomas Frizzo, Therese E. Sverdrup, Thea House, Tripat Gill, Maksim Fedotov, Tamar Paltrow, Clare Am Sutherland, .

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The COVID-19 pandemic (and its aftermath) highlights a critical need to communicate health information effectively to the global public. Given that subtle differences in information framing can have meaningful effects on behavior, behavioral science research highlights a pressing question: Is it more effective to frame COVID-19 health messages in terms of potential losses (e.g., “If you do not practice these steps, you can endanger yourself and others”) or potential gains (e.g., “If you practice these steps, you can protect yourself and others”)? Collecting data in 48 languages from 15,929 participants in 84 countries, we experimentally tested the effects of message framing on COVID-19-related judgments, intentions, and feelings. Loss- (vs. gain-) framed messages increased self-reported anxiety among participants cross-nationally with little-to-no impact on policy attitudes, behavioral intentions, or information seeking relevant to pandemic risks. These results were consistent across 84 countries, three variations of the message framing wording, and 560 data processing and analytic choices. Thus, results provide an empirical answer to a global communication question and highlight the emotional toll of loss-framed messages. Critically, this work demonstrates the importance of considering unintended affective consequences when evaluating nudge-style interventions.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)577-602
Number of pages26
JournalAffective Science
Volume3
Issue number3
Early online date26 Sept 2022
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Sept 2022

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work was supported by the following sources: National Science Foundation (SES-1559511; J.S. Lerner); National Institutes of Health/National Cancer Institute (RO1-CA-224545; V.W. Rees; also J.S. Lerner); European Union’s Horizon 2020 research and innovation program, grant agreement No 769595 (Z. Chen); JSPS KAKENHI 16H03079, 17H00875, 18K12015, and 20H04581 (Y. Yamada); Research Grant EDUHK 28611118 awarded to W. Law by the Research Grant Council, Hong Kong Special Administrative Region, China; the Japanese Psychological Association, Grant for research and practical activities related to the spread of the novel coronavirus to (T. Ishii; K. Ihaya); Social Sciences and Humanities Research Council of Canada (# 950-224884; T. Gill); Program FUTURE LEADER of Lorraine Université d’Excellence within the program Investissements Avenir (ANR-15-IDEX-04-LUE) operated by the French National Research Agency (S. Massoni); the Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology (UID/PSI/03125/2020; R.R. Ribeiro); the Australian Research Council (DP180102384; R.M. Ross); a PhD grant from Fundação para a Ciência e Tecnologia (PD/BD/150570/2020; R. Oliveira); a French National Research Agency ―Investissements d’avenir‖ program grant (ANR-15-IDEX-02) awarded to Hans IJzerman (supporting P.S. Forscher); VIDI Grant 452-17-013 from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (P.M. Isager); Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-20-0319 (P. Kačmár); the Slovak Research and Development (project number APVV-17-0418; P. Babinčák); the Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology (UID/PSI/03125/2020; P. Arriaga); the Huo Family Foundation (N. Johannes); the research program ―Dipartimenti di Eccellenza‖ from MIUR to the Department of General Psychology of the University of Padua (N. Cellini; G. Mioni); CAPES (Coordenação de Aperfeiçoamento de Pessoal de Nível Superior), number PNPD 3002010037P0 – MEC/CAPES (M.A. Varella); Charles University Research Programme "Progres" Q18 (M. Vranka); Polish National Science Center & DFG Beethoven grant (2016/23/G/HS6/01775; M. Parzuchowski); the Foundation for Polish Science (; A. Groyecka-Bernard); the National Science Centre (2020/36/T/HS6/00256; M. Misiak; 2020/36/T/HS6/00254; A. Groyecka-Bernard); IDN Being Human Lab, University of Wroclaw (M. Misiak, A. Sorokowska, P. Sorokowski); Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-18-0140 (M. Martončik); Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-17-0596 (M. Hruška); Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-20-0319 (M. Adamkovič); Rubicon Grant (019.183SG.007) from the Netherlands Organisation for Scientific Research (K. van Schie); the National Science Centre, Poland (UMO-2019/35/B/HS6/00528; K. Barzykowski); the statutory funds of the Institute of Psychology, Jagiellonian University (M. Kossowska, P. Szwed, G. Czarnek), ANID Millennium Science Initiative /Millennium Institute for Research on Depression and Personality-MIDAP ICS13_005 FONDECYT 1221538 (J.R. Silva); Knut and Alice Wallenberg Foundation (2016:0229; J.K. Olofsson); the Slovak Research and Development Agency APVV-15-0662 (J.Benka); the Sherwin Early Career Professor in the Rock Ethics Institute (J.A. Soto); Penn State's Office of the Senior Faculty Mentor (J.A. Soto); German National Academic Foundation (J. Berkessel); the Scientific Grant Agency of the Slovak Republic under the grant No. VEGA 1/0748/19 (J. Bavolar); Chair for Public Trust in Health, Grenoble Ecole de Management (I. Ziano); PRIMUS/20/HUM/009 (I. Ropovik); Tufts University (H. Urry); the National Institute of Mental Health T32MN018931 (H. Moshontz); APVV-17-0418 (G. Banik); J. William Fulbright Program (F. Azevedo); the Innovational Research Incentives Scheme Veni from the Netherlands Organization for Scientific Research—Division for the Social Sciences 451-15-028 (E.S. Smit); AWS Imagine Grant (E.M. Buchanan); the Basic Research Program at the National Research University Higher School of Economics (D. Grigoryev); the Basic Research Program at HSE University, RF (D.Dubrov). Contract no. APVV-18-0140 (D. Dubrov); the Research Council of Norway 288083, 223273 (C. Tamnes); the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2020023 (A.D. Askelund); the South-Eastern Norway Regional Health Authority 2019069, 2021070, 500189 (C. Tamnes); EFOP-3.6.1.-16-2016-00004 and NKFIH PD 137588 (A.N. Zsido); Faculty Development Grant from Dominican University (A.J. Krafnick); Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology SFRH/BD/126304/2016 (A.C. Santos); the statutory funds of the University of Wroclaw (A. Sorokowska); Internal funding from Kingston University (A. Gourdon-Kanhukamwe); the Slovak Research and Development Agency under contract no. APVV-17-0596 (A. Findor); Pacifica and the ANRT through the CIFRE grant 2017/0245 (A. Bran); Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology UIDP/4950/2020 (I. Almeida, A. Ferreira, D. Sousa); PhD grant co-funded by the Portuguese National Foundation for Science and Technology and the European Social Fund 2020.08597.BD (A. Ferreira); European Project H2020 Grant agreement ID 731827 STIPED - Transcranial brain stimulation as innovative therapy for chronic pediatric neuropsychiatric disorders (D. Sousa); a special grant from the Association for Psychological Science (to the Psychological Science Accelerator); an in-kind purchase from the Leibniz Institute for Psychology (protocol https://doi.org/10.23668/psycharchives.3012 ); a fee waiver from Prolific, Inc. Further financial support was provided by the Psychological Science Accelerator. We thank the Leibniz Institute for Psychology (ZPID) for help with data collection via the organization and implementation of semi-representative panels. Funders had no other roles in study design, data collection and analysis, decision to publish or preparation of the manuscript.

Keywords

  • Anxiety
  • COVID-19
  • Message framing
  • Nudges

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'In COVID-19 Health Messaging, Loss Framing Increases Anxiety with Little-to-No Concomitant Benefits: Experimental Evidence from 84 Countries'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this