In Praise of Amateurs

Tim Ingold* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

12 Citations (Scopus)


The amateur studies a subject for the love of it, as a way of life. This article tracks the changing relationship between amateur scholarship and professionalism, in light of the author’s experience over five decades. It shows how the capture of professionalism by corporate and managerial interests has brought it into tension with the principles of amateur study, and how this tension has played out specifically in anthropology. Here, the amateur commitment to day-to-day knowing, enshrined in the discipline’s signature approach of participant observation, is compromised by its professional rebranding as ethnography. The approach nevertheless sets an example for other walks of study that share with anthropology the urge to wander along with that which captures their attention. Today’s professionalised regimes of research leave little room for wandering. Abjuring the straitjacket of corporate professionalism, however, opens the way for an amateur scholarship that is both practically activist and potentially transformative.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)153-172
Number of pages20
Issue number1
Early online date12 Oct 2020
Publication statusPublished - 1 Jan 2021

Bibliographical note

This paper began as an eponymous lecture, presented at the University of Aberdeen on December 6th, 2018, to mark the occasion of my retirement. I would like to thank all my colleagues and students in the Department of Anthropology for honouring me in this way. As much of the content of that lecture has since been published elsewhere, I have rewritten the current version almost in its entirety, but have retained the title.


  • Amateurism
  • discipline
  • expertise
  • participant observation
  • professionalism
  • scholarship


Dive into the research topics of 'In Praise of Amateurs'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this