Abstract
Constitutional law is a concept rarely used in international arbitration. Instead, tribunals have greater familiarity with the notion of public policy as the boundary which dictates jurisdictional—and substantive—limits, where the meeting point is the New York Convention.
The link between international arbitration and constitutional law becomes even more complex when adding a public international law dimension. Constitutional law is not uniform across the many existing legal cultures. Unlike treaties and international principles embedded in international law, constitutional approaches may vary. In some jurisdictions, constitutions reflect a clear view of precise general legal principles and human rights, while in others constitutional law is a vast legal field encompassing national values, as well as judicial, legislative and administrative governmental axioms.
The link between international arbitration and constitutional law becomes even more complex when adding a public international law dimension. Constitutional law is not uniform across the many existing legal cultures. Unlike treaties and international principles embedded in international law, constitutional approaches may vary. In some jurisdictions, constitutions reflect a clear view of precise general legal principles and human rights, while in others constitutional law is a vast legal field encompassing national values, as well as judicial, legislative and administrative governmental axioms.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Number of pages | 6 |
Journal | ICSID Review - Foreign Investment Law Journal |
Early online date | 22 Jun 2023 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | E-pub ahead of print - 22 Jun 2023 |