Is Implicit Level-2 Visual perspective taking embodied? Perceptual simulation of others’ perspectives is not impaired by motor restriction

Eleanor Ward* (Corresponding Author), Giorgio Ganis, Katrina L. McDonough, Patric Bach

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Working paper

Abstract

Embodied accounts of visual perspective taking suggest that judgements from another person’s perspective are less effortful if one’s own body position aligns with that of the other person, indicating a causal role of posture in visual perspective taking. Using our adapted mental rotation paradigm, here we tested whether movement has a causal role in perspective taking, by restricting participants’ movement in half of the experimental trials. Here we show, using our previously validated task, that the perceptual representation of another’s visual perspective is not influenced by participants’ ability to move. These data therefore rule out active physical movement as a causal explanation of visual perspective taking and instead argue that postural readjustments when making judgements from another’s perspective are a bodily consequence of the mental transformations of a person’s actual to imagined position in space.
Original languageEnglish
PublisherPsyArXiv Preprints
DOIs
Publication statusSubmitted - 15 Oct 2019

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements: We thank the members of the Action Prediction Lab, Plymouth University, (www.actionprediction.org) for discussion and comment on an earlier version of this article. Eleanor Ward was funded by a PhD student grant from the University of Plymouth.

Keywords

  • visual perspective taking
  • perceptual simulation
  • navigation
  • mental rotation
  • mental imagery
  • active inference

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Is Implicit Level-2 Visual perspective taking embodied? Perceptual simulation of others’ perspectives is not impaired by motor restriction'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this