This chapter looks at international soft law against the background of broader issues about the normativity of law. It explores the ways in which “institutional normativity” operates across legal systems with special focus on the relationship between different constructs of validity. The chapter develops a narrowly defined “core” concept of validity that reflects the minimum conditions for providing effective normative guidance in institutional settings. This concept revolves around the idea that validity establishes a mediated relationship between the legitimacy of law and the internal processes of legal practices. The chapter argues that more specific constructs of validity are political constructs that reflect the concrete political and institutional dynamics of particular legal practices. This point about the coexistence of different constructs of legality and legal validity is demonstrated by an analysis of the relationship between international law and modern state law. The chapter characterise the proliferation of international soft law as one manifestation of the tensions that this coexistence brings about. The growing volume and significance of international soft law has a lot to do with a constraining model of legality in domestic legal systems which have a spillover effect on international law. Soft law often needs to fill normative spaces that have been made hard to access for hard international law. For a more concrete analysis, issues about international soft law in the field of human rights law are picked out. Using the General Comments of the UN Committee on Economic, Social and Cultural Rights as an example, the chapter looks at the legitimacy problems that the proliferation of soft law generates.
|Title of host publication||Legal Validity and Soft Law|
|Editors||Pauline Westerman, Jaap Hage, Stephan Kirste, Anne Ruth Mackor|
|Place of Publication||Cham|
|Number of pages||22|
|Publication status||Published - Dec 2018|
|Name||Law and Philosophy Library|
|Publisher||Springer International Publishing|
Bibliographical noteI am grateful for useful comments from the participants in the Groningen Workshop and subsequent research seminars held in Aberdeen and Debrecen where earlier versions of this chapter were presented. I am particularly thankful to Mátyás Bencze, Irene Couzigou, Tamás Győrfi, Tamás Hoffmann, Andrei Marmor, Paolo Sandro, Robert Taylor, Dietmar von der Pfordten, and Zsolt Ződi. I am also grateful for the anonymous reviewer’s comments on my chapter.
- international soft law
- normative guidance
- institutional normativity
- formal validity
- ascertainment of law
- state law
- human rights law
- standard instruments
FingerprintDive into the research topics of 'Legal Validity, Soft Law, and International Human Rights Law'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.
- School of Law, Law - Personal Chair
- School of Law, Centre for Constitutional and Public International Law