Letter to the editor: Validity of tests for publication integrity

Mark J Bolland; Alison Avenell; Andrew Grey

doi:10.1002/ijgo.15182

Letter to the editor: Validity of tests for publication integrity

Mark J Bolland^* (Corresponding Author), Alison Avenell, Andrew Grey

^*Corresponding author for this work

University of Auckland

Research output: Contribution to journal › Letter › peer-review

2 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

Khan and colleagues argue that the lack of validation of tests of the integrity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a major problem.1 We think there are three major problems with their thesis: the unavailability of validation datasets; the narrow focus on research misconduct; and the conflation of publication integrity with researcher behavior (“misconduct”)....

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	1043-1044
Number of pages	2
Journal	International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics
Volume	163
Issue number	3
Early online date	4 Oct 2023
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1002/ijgo.15182
Publication status	Published - Dec 2023

Access to Document

10.1002/ijgo.15182Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{df877495347d40949fb1e0a70046e0d8,

title = "Letter to the editor: Validity of tests for publication integrity",

abstract = "Khan and colleagues argue that the lack of validation of tests of the integrity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a major problem.1 We think there are three major problems with their thesis: the unavailability of validation datasets; the narrow focus on research misconduct; and the conflation of publication integrity with researcher behavior (“misconduct”)....",

author = "Bolland, {Mark J} and Alison Avenell and Andrew Grey",

year = "2023",

month = dec,

doi = "10.1002/ijgo.15182",

language = "English",

volume = "163",

pages = "1043--1044",

journal = "International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics",

issn = "0020-7292",

publisher = "Wiley",

number = "3",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Letter to the editor

T2 - Validity of tests for publication integrity

AU - Bolland, Mark J

AU - Avenell, Alison

AU - Grey, Andrew

PY - 2023/12

Y1 - 2023/12

N2 - Khan and colleagues argue that the lack of validation of tests of the integrity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a major problem.1 We think there are three major problems with their thesis: the unavailability of validation datasets; the narrow focus on research misconduct; and the conflation of publication integrity with researcher behavior (“misconduct”)....

AB - Khan and colleagues argue that the lack of validation of tests of the integrity of randomized controlled trials (RCTs) is a major problem.1 We think there are three major problems with their thesis: the unavailability of validation datasets; the narrow focus on research misconduct; and the conflation of publication integrity with researcher behavior (“misconduct”)....

U2 - 10.1002/ijgo.15182

DO - 10.1002/ijgo.15182

M3 - Letter

C2 - 37789725

SN - 0020-7292

VL - 163

SP - 1043

EP - 1044

JO - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

JF - International Journal of Gynecology & Obstetrics

IS - 3

ER -

Letter to the editor: Validity of tests for publication integrity

Abstract

Access to Document

Fingerprint

Cite this