Low-bandwidth tele-ultrasound

J. A. Brebner*, H. Ruddick-Bracken, E. M. Brebner, F. J. Gilbert, J. R. Maclean, L. D. Ritchie, P. Smith, A. Thompson

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticle

8 Citations (Scopus)


We examined the acceptability and diagnostic accuracy of dynamic ultrasound images transmitted at 128 kbit/s and 384 kbit/s. The gold standard was the direct recording of 200 ultrasound examinations on video-tape. The taped images were later transmitted at both 128 kbit/s and 384 kbit/s and recorded, resulting in three tapes for each case. Four observers viewed each tape individually. Ninety per cent of images transmitted at 384 kbit/s were rated as diagnostically acceptable compared with 32% of images transmitted at 128 kbit/s. Diagnostic agreement between tapes transmitted at 384 kbit/s and the gold standard was 85%, compared with 78% for 128 kbit/s transmissions. Observers were not satisfied with low-bandwidth transmission of ultrasound images despite adequate diagnostic accuracy. Dynamic ultrasound images transmitted at 384 kbit/s were viewed as both diagnostically acceptable and accurate.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)75-76
Number of pages2
JournalJournal of telemedicine and telecare
Issue numberSuppl 1
Publication statusPublished - 1999

Cite this