Making ends meet: A conceptual and ethical analysis of efficiency

Polly Mitchell* (Corresponding Author), Sonya Crowe, Martin Utley, Vikki Entwistle, Alan Cribb

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

Abstract

Efficiency is often overlooked as an ethical value and seen as ethically relevant chiefly when it conflicts with other values, such as equality. This paper argues that efficiency is a rich and philosophically interesting concept deserving of independent normative examination. Drawing on a detailed healthcare case study, we argue that making assessments of efficiency involves value-laden, deliberative judgements about how to characterise the functioning of
human systems. Personal and emotional resources and ends are crucial to system functioning, but often discounted in favour of a relatively narrow set of financial inputs and institutional or procedural outputs. Judgements about efficiency tend to advantage (or disadvantage) different parties, depending on the resources and ends considered. Different constructions of efficiency
can therefore promote or neglect the perspectives and interests of differently placed actors. Models of efficiency do not merely embody contestable ethical standpoints but—put to use— can unwittingly reify and reproduce them
Original languageEnglish
JournalKennedy Institute Ethics Journal
Publication statusAccepted/In press - 18 Mar 2024

Keywords

  • efficiency
  • value
  • deliberation
  • measurement
  • healthcare administration
  • management

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Making ends meet: A conceptual and ethical analysis of efficiency'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this