Abstract
Introduction: Escalation of chemical disinfection during the COVID-19 pandemic raised occupational hazard concerns. Alternative and potentially safer methods such as ultraviolet-C (UVC) irradiation and ozone are desirable, notwithstanding the lack of standardized criteria for their use in the healthcare environment.
Aim: Compare the virucidal activity of 70% ethanol, sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), chlorhexidine, ozonated water, UVC-222 nm, UVC-254 nm against three SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns cultured in vitro.
Methods: Inactivation of three SARS‐CoV‐2 variants (alpha, beta, gamma) by the following chemical methods was tested: ethanol 70%, NaDCC (100 ppm, 500 ppm, 1000 ppm), chlorhexidine (2%, 1% and 0.5%), ozonated water 7 ppm. For irradiation, a je2Care 222nm UVC Lamp was compared to a Sylvania G15 UV254 nm lamp on SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Results: Viral inactivation by >3 log was achieved with ethanol, NaDCC and chlorhexidine. The minor virucidal effect of ozonated water was <1 log. Virus treatment with UVC-254 nm reduced viral activity by 1-5 logs with higher inactivation after exposure for 3 minutes compared to 6 seconds. For all three variants, under equivalent conditions, exposure to UVC-222 nm did not achieve time-dependent inactivation as was observed with treatment with UVC-254 nm.
Conclusion: The virucidal activity on replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 by conventional chemical methods, including chlorhexidine at concentrations as low as 0.5%, was not matched by UVC irradiation, and to an even lesser extent by ozonated water treatment.
Aim: Compare the virucidal activity of 70% ethanol, sodium dichloroisocyanurate (NaDCC), chlorhexidine, ozonated water, UVC-222 nm, UVC-254 nm against three SARS-CoV-2 variants of concerns cultured in vitro.
Methods: Inactivation of three SARS‐CoV‐2 variants (alpha, beta, gamma) by the following chemical methods was tested: ethanol 70%, NaDCC (100 ppm, 500 ppm, 1000 ppm), chlorhexidine (2%, 1% and 0.5%), ozonated water 7 ppm. For irradiation, a je2Care 222nm UVC Lamp was compared to a Sylvania G15 UV254 nm lamp on SARS-CoV-2 variants.
Results: Viral inactivation by >3 log was achieved with ethanol, NaDCC and chlorhexidine. The minor virucidal effect of ozonated water was <1 log. Virus treatment with UVC-254 nm reduced viral activity by 1-5 logs with higher inactivation after exposure for 3 minutes compared to 6 seconds. For all three variants, under equivalent conditions, exposure to UVC-222 nm did not achieve time-dependent inactivation as was observed with treatment with UVC-254 nm.
Conclusion: The virucidal activity on replication-competent SARS-CoV-2 by conventional chemical methods, including chlorhexidine at concentrations as low as 0.5%, was not matched by UVC irradiation, and to an even lesser extent by ozonated water treatment.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Article number | 100339 |
Number of pages | 4 |
Journal | Infection Prevention in Practice |
Volume | 6 |
Issue number | 1 |
Early online date | 12 Jan 2024 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - Mar 2024 |
Bibliographical note
This work was funded by National Health Service Grampian Charity. DECL received support from UK Biotechnology and Biological Sciences Research Council and the USA National Science Foundation (BB/W002760/1).Acknowledgment
We thank John Ellison for provision of the je2Care 222nm UVC Lamp, and Novus ltd for access to the EORG water ozonation unit.
Keywords
- SARS-CoV-2
- Virucidal
- Ultraviolet-C
- Ozonated water
- Chlorhexidine
- sodium dichloroisocyanurate