Multispecies Scholarship and Encounters: Changing Assumptions at the Human-Animal Nexus

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

58 Citations (Scopus)
24 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Changing attitudes towards animals in modern industrialised societies has triggered new lines of scholarly enquiry. The emergence of Human-Animal Studies (HAS) is part of the turn towards animals within the social sciences. Although sociology is a relative newcomer to multispecies scholarship, more than three decades ago a sociologist anticipated that the discipline might benefit from attending to the ‘zoological connection’ (Bryant, 1979). Bringing to the fore what usually remains in the shadowy background, i.e. our symbolic and material relations with nonhuman animals, has started to unearth underexplored areas of social life. This is a noteworthy retrieval, because it reminds us of the multifaceted and entangled nature of interspecies interfaces, networks and encounters. This article suggests that seeing life through a multispecies lens not only allows scholars in cognate and non-cognate disciplines an opportunity to engage in innovative scholarship, it also lays the groundwork to animalise the sociological imagination and sociologise HAS.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)323-339
Number of pages17
JournalSociology
Volume49
Issue number2
Early online date22 Jul 2013
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Apr 2015

Bibliographical note

Acknowledgements
I would like to thank the two anonymous referees for their constructive comments. I am also grateful to Andrew McKinnon and Steve Bruce for their feedback on earlier drafts of the paper.
Funding
This research received no specific grant from any funding agency in the public, commercial, or not-for-profit sectors.

Keywords

  • animals and sociology
  • animal turn
  • human-animal studies
  • multispecies scholarships

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Multispecies Scholarship and Encounters: Changing Assumptions at the Human-Animal Nexus'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this