TY - JOUR
T1 - Permanent grasslands in Europe
T2 - Land use change and intensification decrease their multifunctionality
AU - Schils, René L.M.
AU - Bufe, Conny
AU - Rhymer, Caroline M.
AU - Francksen, Richard M.
AU - Klaus, Valentin H.
AU - Abdalla, Mohamed
AU - Milazzo, Filippo
AU - Lellei-Kovács, Eszter
AU - Berge, Hein ten
AU - Bertora, Chiara
AU - Chodkiewicz, Anna
AU - Dǎmǎtîrcǎ, Claudia
AU - Feigenwinter, Iris
AU - Fernández-Rebollo, Pilar
AU - Ghiasi, Shiva
AU - Hejduk, Stanislav
AU - Hiron, Matthew
AU - Janicka, Maria
AU - Pellaton, Raoul
AU - Smith, Kate E.
AU - Thorman, Rachel
AU - Vanwalleghem, Tom
AU - Williams, John
AU - Zavattaro, Laura
AU - Kampen, Jarl
AU - Derkx, Ria
AU - Smith, Pete
AU - Whittingham, Mark J.
AU - Buchmann, Nina
AU - Price, J. Paul Newell
N1 - Acknowledgments
We acknowledge the financial support of this work by European Union Horizon 2020 research and innovation programme, under grant agreement 774124, project SUPER-G (Developing Sustainable Permanent Grassland Systems and Policies).
PY - 2022/6/1
Y1 - 2022/6/1
N2 - Permanent grasslands cover 34% of the European Union’s agricultural area and are vital for a wide variety of ecosystem services essential for our society. Over recent decades, the permanent grassland area has declined and land use change continues to threaten its extent. Simultaneously, the management intensity of permanent grasslands increased. We performed a systematic literature review on the multifunctionality of permanent grasslands in Europe, examining the effects of land use and management on 19 grassland ecosystem service indicators. Based on the evidence in 696 out of 70,456 screened papers, published since 1980, we found that both land use change and intensification of management decreased multifunctionality. In particular, preventing conversion of permanent grasslands to croplands secured the delivery of multiple ecosystem services. A lower management intensity was associated with benefits for biodiversity, climate regulation and water purification, but impacted the provision of high-quality animal feed. Increasing the number of species in the sward enhanced multifunctionality of permanent grassland without significant trade-offs such as losses in production. Our review covered many aspects of land use, management and ecosystem services, but we also identified areas with no or only few studies. The most prominent gaps were related to comparisons between permanent and temporary grasslands, and effects of management practices on the provision of cultural values, and on erosion and flood control. We suggest that, despite apparent changes in human dietary preferences, the protection of permanent grasslands in Europe must be prioritised. At the same time, considering the need to reduce ruminant livestock’s contribution to climate change, the time seems ripe to increase support for low-intensity grassland management to optimise the provision of essential ecosystem services from Europe’s permanent grasslands.
AB - Permanent grasslands cover 34% of the European Union’s agricultural area and are vital for a wide variety of ecosystem services essential for our society. Over recent decades, the permanent grassland area has declined and land use change continues to threaten its extent. Simultaneously, the management intensity of permanent grasslands increased. We performed a systematic literature review on the multifunctionality of permanent grasslands in Europe, examining the effects of land use and management on 19 grassland ecosystem service indicators. Based on the evidence in 696 out of 70,456 screened papers, published since 1980, we found that both land use change and intensification of management decreased multifunctionality. In particular, preventing conversion of permanent grasslands to croplands secured the delivery of multiple ecosystem services. A lower management intensity was associated with benefits for biodiversity, climate regulation and water purification, but impacted the provision of high-quality animal feed. Increasing the number of species in the sward enhanced multifunctionality of permanent grassland without significant trade-offs such as losses in production. Our review covered many aspects of land use, management and ecosystem services, but we also identified areas with no or only few studies. The most prominent gaps were related to comparisons between permanent and temporary grasslands, and effects of management practices on the provision of cultural values, and on erosion and flood control. We suggest that, despite apparent changes in human dietary preferences, the protection of permanent grasslands in Europe must be prioritised. At the same time, considering the need to reduce ruminant livestock’s contribution to climate change, the time seems ripe to increase support for low-intensity grassland management to optimise the provision of essential ecosystem services from Europe’s permanent grasslands.
KW - Agro-ecology
KW - Ecosystem services
KW - Grassland
KW - Land use change
KW - Systematic literature review
U2 - 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107891
DO - 10.1016/j.agee.2022.107891
M3 - Article
SN - 0167-8809
VL - 330
JO - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
JF - Agriculture Ecosystems & Environment
M1 - 107891
ER -