TY - JOUR
T1 - Personalized pain assessment
T2 - What does ‘acceptable pain’ mean to you?
AU - Forget, Patrice
AU - Kahtan, Hanaa
AU - Jordan, Abbie
PY - 2023/10
Y1 - 2023/10
N2 - Background: What ‘acceptable pain’ means may be different for everyone and dependent on the moment and the context. In this text, we explore the concepts of pain acceptability and acceptance. We explain why we need to better explore (un)acceptable pain, to eventually facilitate pain assessment and management. Methods: Using different approaches and perspectives (with examples and application from multiple disciplines, i.e. orthopaedics, psychology, pharmacological therapy), we discussed anecdotal examples and included a systematic, scoping and literature review. Results: We rejected the idea that in the context of chronic pain, acceptability, disability and manageability overlap neatly. Additionally, we rejected the validity of pain intensity rating scales to sufficiently explore individuals' experience of pain. In the one study that met our criteria, a definition of ‘acceptable pain’ was dropped as participants deemed it inappropriate because it did not address the significant challenges associated with pain. This is important, however, because the acceptability of pain may precede, follow and/or inform the ‘pain acceptance’ process, which is an important concept associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: Very little is known regarding what ‘acceptable pain’ may mean to people living with pain. Qualitative studies may improve our understanding of individuals' perceptions, perspectives and expectations as we do not know, for the moment, what ‘acceptable pain’ may mean to a particular person and, potentially, regarding a specific treatment or other contextual aspects that are not captured with currently used scores and quantitative measures. Significance: What does ‘acceptable pain’ mean may differ between people with painful experiences and may depend on contextual factors. Pain acceptability may be distinct from manageability, and may precede, follow and/or inform the ‘pain acceptance’ process. This text, rigorously based on a review of the existing literature, defends the idea that acceptable pain should be better studied.
AB - Background: What ‘acceptable pain’ means may be different for everyone and dependent on the moment and the context. In this text, we explore the concepts of pain acceptability and acceptance. We explain why we need to better explore (un)acceptable pain, to eventually facilitate pain assessment and management. Methods: Using different approaches and perspectives (with examples and application from multiple disciplines, i.e. orthopaedics, psychology, pharmacological therapy), we discussed anecdotal examples and included a systematic, scoping and literature review. Results: We rejected the idea that in the context of chronic pain, acceptability, disability and manageability overlap neatly. Additionally, we rejected the validity of pain intensity rating scales to sufficiently explore individuals' experience of pain. In the one study that met our criteria, a definition of ‘acceptable pain’ was dropped as participants deemed it inappropriate because it did not address the significant challenges associated with pain. This is important, however, because the acceptability of pain may precede, follow and/or inform the ‘pain acceptance’ process, which is an important concept associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: Very little is known regarding what ‘acceptable pain’ may mean to people living with pain. Qualitative studies may improve our understanding of individuals' perceptions, perspectives and expectations as we do not know, for the moment, what ‘acceptable pain’ may mean to a particular person and, potentially, regarding a specific treatment or other contextual aspects that are not captured with currently used scores and quantitative measures. Significance: What does ‘acceptable pain’ mean may differ between people with painful experiences and may depend on contextual factors. Pain acceptability may be distinct from manageability, and may precede, follow and/or inform the ‘pain acceptance’ process. This text, rigorously based on a review of the existing literature, defends the idea that acceptable pain should be better studied.
UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=85167689811&partnerID=8YFLogxK
U2 - 10.1002/ejp.2166
DO - 10.1002/ejp.2166
M3 - Article
C2 - 37565743
AN - SCOPUS:85167689811
SN - 1090-3801
VL - 27
SP - 1139
EP - 1143
JO - European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)
JF - European Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)
IS - 9
ER -