Personalized pain assessment: What does ‘acceptable pain’ mean to you?

Patrice Forget* (Corresponding Author), Hanaa Kahtan, Abbie Jordan

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)

Abstract

Background: What ‘acceptable pain’ means may be different for everyone and dependent on the moment and the context. In this text, we explore the concepts of pain acceptability and acceptance. We explain why we need to better explore (un)acceptable pain, to eventually facilitate pain assessment and management. Methods: Using different approaches and perspectives (with examples and application from multiple disciplines, i.e. orthopaedics, psychology, pharmacological therapy), we discussed anecdotal examples and included a systematic, scoping and literature review. Results: We rejected the idea that in the context of chronic pain, acceptability, disability and manageability overlap neatly. Additionally, we rejected the validity of pain intensity rating scales to sufficiently explore individuals' experience of pain. In the one study that met our criteria, a definition of ‘acceptable pain’ was dropped as participants deemed it inappropriate because it did not address the significant challenges associated with pain. This is important, however, because the acceptability of pain may precede, follow and/or inform the ‘pain acceptance’ process, which is an important concept associated with better outcomes. Conclusions: Very little is known regarding what ‘acceptable pain’ may mean to people living with pain. Qualitative studies may improve our understanding of individuals' perceptions, perspectives and expectations as we do not know, for the moment, what ‘acceptable pain’ may mean to a particular person and, potentially, regarding a specific treatment or other contextual aspects that are not captured with currently used scores and quantitative measures. Significance: What does ‘acceptable pain’ mean may differ between people with painful experiences and may depend on contextual factors. Pain acceptability may be distinct from manageability, and may precede, follow and/or inform the ‘pain acceptance’ process. This text, rigorously based on a review of the existing literature, defends the idea that acceptable pain should be better studied.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1139-1143
Number of pages5
JournalEuropean Journal of Pain (United Kingdom)
Volume27
Issue number9
Early online date3 Sept 2023
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Oct 2023

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Personalized pain assessment: What does ‘acceptable pain’ mean to you?'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this