Abstract
Purpose: Duligotuzumab is a dual-action antibody directed against EGFR and HER3. Experimental design: mCRC patients with KRAS ex2 wild-type received duligotuzumab or cetuximab and FOLFIRI until progression or intolerable toxicity. Mandatory tumor samples underwent mutation and biomarker analysis. Efficacy analysis was conducted in patients with RAS exon 2/3 wild-type tumors. Results: Of 134 randomized patients, 98 were RAS ex2/3 wild-type. Duligotuzumab provided no PFS or OR benefit compared to cetuximab; though there was a trend for lower ORR in the duligotuzumab arm. No relationship was seen between PFS or ORR and ERBB3, NRG1, or AREG expression. There were fewer skin rash events for duligotuzumab but more diarrhea. Although the incidence of grade ≥ 3 AEs was similar, the frequency of serious AEs was higher for duligotuzumab. Conclusions: Duligotuzumab plus FOLFIRI did not appear to improve the outcomes in patients with RAS exon 2/3 wild-type mCRC compared to cetuximab + FOLFIRI.
Original language | English |
---|---|
Pages (from-to) | 2276-2284 |
Number of pages | 9 |
Journal | Clinical Cancer Research |
Volume | 24 |
Issue number | 10 |
Early online date | 5 Mar 2018 |
DOIs | |
Publication status | Published - May 2018 |
Bibliographical note
AcknowledgmentsThe authors wish many thanks to all of the patients and the investigators who participated in this study. Writing assistance was provided by Genentech, Inc. This work was supported by Genentech, Inc. The costs of publication of this article were defrayed in part by the payment of page charges. This article must therefore be hereby marked advertisement in accordance with 18 U.S.C. Section 1734 solely to indicate this fact.