Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae

Mitchell E. Nuhn; Manfred Binder; Andy F.S. Taylor; Roy E. Halling; David S. Hibbett

doi:10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008

Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae

Mitchell E. Nuhn, Manfred Binder, Andy F.S. Taylor, Roy E. Halling, David S. Hibbett^*

^*Corresponding author for this work

Aberdeen Centre For Environmental Sustainability

Research output: Contribution to journal › Article › peer-review

170 Citations (Scopus)

Abstract

The generic and sub-generic relationships in the Boletineae (Boletales) were studied using nuclear large subunit (nuc-lsu), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), and DNA directed RNA polymerase largest subunit (RPB1). The Boletineae, with the exclusion of Hydnomerulius pinastri, was strongly supported and the status of the families Boletaceae and Paxillaceae is discussed. Members of the genus Boletus are found throughout the phylogeny, with the majority not closely related to the type species, Boletus edulis. Many of the traditional, morphologically defined genera are not supported as monophyletic and additional sampling and taxonomic revisions are needed. The majority of the Boletineae are confirmed or putatively ectomycorrhizal (ECM), but two putatively mycoparasitic lineages (one lineage of Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Chalciporus piperatus and the second Pseudoboletus parasiticus) are strongly supported.

Original language	English
Pages (from-to)	479-511
Number of pages	33
Journal	Fungal Biology
Volume	117
Issue number	7-8
DOIs	https://doi.org/10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008
Publication status	Published - Jul 2013

Bibliographical note

Funding Information:
This work has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation , including award DEB-1020421 to REH, DSH and MB. We thank the many collaborators who provided specimens and DNA, including Ernst Both and PB Matheny who provided gDNA for Boletus semigastroideus. We would like to thank Duccio Migliorini for preparing the interactions between Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Phaeolus schweinitzii. Alfredo Justo provided helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments and suggestions.

Keywords

Boletaceae
Ecology
Paxillaceae
Systematics
Taxonomic review

UN SDGs

This output contributes to the following UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDGs)

Access to Document

10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008Licence: Unspecified

Cite this

@article{3b2f65a7cbef4da3a76a2e11eb0c4a5c,

title = "Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae",

abstract = "The generic and sub-generic relationships in the Boletineae (Boletales) were studied using nuclear large subunit (nuc-lsu), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), and DNA directed RNA polymerase largest subunit (RPB1). The Boletineae, with the exclusion of Hydnomerulius pinastri, was strongly supported and the status of the families Boletaceae and Paxillaceae is discussed. Members of the genus Boletus are found throughout the phylogeny, with the majority not closely related to the type species, Boletus edulis. Many of the traditional, morphologically defined genera are not supported as monophyletic and additional sampling and taxonomic revisions are needed. The majority of the Boletineae are confirmed or putatively ectomycorrhizal (ECM), but two putatively mycoparasitic lineages (one lineage of Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Chalciporus piperatus and the second Pseudoboletus parasiticus) are strongly supported.",

keywords = "Boletaceae, Ecology, Paxillaceae, Systematics, Taxonomic review",

author = "Nuhn, {Mitchell E.} and Manfred Binder and Taylor, {Andy F.S.} and Halling, {Roy E.} and Hibbett, {David S.}",

note = "Funding Information: This work has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation , including award DEB-1020421 to REH, DSH and MB. We thank the many collaborators who provided specimens and DNA, including Ernst Both and PB Matheny who provided gDNA for Boletus semigastroideus. We would like to thank Duccio Migliorini for preparing the interactions between Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Phaeolus schweinitzii. Alfredo Justo provided helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments and suggestions. ",

year = "2013",

month = jul,

doi = "10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008",

language = "English",

volume = "117",

pages = "479--511",

journal = "Fungal Biology",

issn = "1878-6146",

publisher = "Elsevier",

number = "7-8",

}

TY - JOUR

T1 - Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae

AU - Nuhn, Mitchell E.

AU - Binder, Manfred

AU - Taylor, Andy F.S.

AU - Halling, Roy E.

AU - Hibbett, David S.

N1 - Funding Information: This work has been supported by grants from the National Science Foundation , including award DEB-1020421 to REH, DSH and MB. We thank the many collaborators who provided specimens and DNA, including Ernst Both and PB Matheny who provided gDNA for Boletus semigastroideus. We would like to thank Duccio Migliorini for preparing the interactions between Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Phaeolus schweinitzii. Alfredo Justo provided helpful comments on the manuscript. We thank the two anonymous reviewers who provided helpful comments and suggestions.

PY - 2013/7

Y1 - 2013/7

N2 - The generic and sub-generic relationships in the Boletineae (Boletales) were studied using nuclear large subunit (nuc-lsu), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), and DNA directed RNA polymerase largest subunit (RPB1). The Boletineae, with the exclusion of Hydnomerulius pinastri, was strongly supported and the status of the families Boletaceae and Paxillaceae is discussed. Members of the genus Boletus are found throughout the phylogeny, with the majority not closely related to the type species, Boletus edulis. Many of the traditional, morphologically defined genera are not supported as monophyletic and additional sampling and taxonomic revisions are needed. The majority of the Boletineae are confirmed or putatively ectomycorrhizal (ECM), but two putatively mycoparasitic lineages (one lineage of Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Chalciporus piperatus and the second Pseudoboletus parasiticus) are strongly supported.

AB - The generic and sub-generic relationships in the Boletineae (Boletales) were studied using nuclear large subunit (nuc-lsu), translation elongation factor 1-alpha (tef1), and DNA directed RNA polymerase largest subunit (RPB1). The Boletineae, with the exclusion of Hydnomerulius pinastri, was strongly supported and the status of the families Boletaceae and Paxillaceae is discussed. Members of the genus Boletus are found throughout the phylogeny, with the majority not closely related to the type species, Boletus edulis. Many of the traditional, morphologically defined genera are not supported as monophyletic and additional sampling and taxonomic revisions are needed. The majority of the Boletineae are confirmed or putatively ectomycorrhizal (ECM), but two putatively mycoparasitic lineages (one lineage of Buchwaldoboletus lignicola and Chalciporus piperatus and the second Pseudoboletus parasiticus) are strongly supported.

KW - Boletaceae

KW - Ecology

KW - Paxillaceae

KW - Systematics

KW - Taxonomic review

UR - http://www.scopus.com/inward/record.url?scp=84881369143&partnerID=8YFLogxK

U2 - 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008

DO - 10.1016/j.funbio.2013.04.008

M3 - Article

AN - SCOPUS:84881369143

SN - 1878-6146

VL - 117

SP - 479

EP - 511

JO - Fungal Biology

JF - Fungal Biology

IS - 7-8

ER -

Phylogenetic overview of the Boletineae

Abstract

Bibliographical note

Keywords

UN SDGs

Access to Document

Other files and links

Fingerprint

Cite this