Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis

Khaled Khalaf, John Miskelly, Elena Voge, Tatiana MacFarlane

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

164 Citations (Scopus)
20 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

OBJECTIVES: To determine the prevalence and factors associated with hypotonia.

DESIGN: Systematic review and meta-analysis.

DATA SOURCE: A search strategy was developed along with inclusion criteria and run in MEDLINE and EMBASE (published from 2002 to August 2012) databases to reveal all studies on the prevalence of hypodontia or associated factors. A hand search of reference lists and a Google search aimed to improve the sensitivity of the literature search.

SELECTION CRITERIA: All studies on the prevalence of hypodontia or associated factors published from 2002 onwards were included. Abstracts of non-English papers were also analyzed.

DATA SELECTION AND EXTRACTION: All potential articles were checked against the inclusion criteria independently, and in duplicate by two investigators. A checklist was used to assess the quality of selected studies.

MAIN OUTCOME: Prevalence of hypodontia, excluding third molars.

RESULTS: The overall prevalence of hypodontia was found to be 6.4% (95% CI: 5.7, 7.2). There was a statistically significant difference in the prevalence of hypodontia by continent (Q = 34.18, P<0.001). Prevalence of hypodontia was the highest in Africa: 13.4% (95% CI: 9.7, 18.0), followed by Europe (7% CI: 6.0-8.0%), Asia (6.3% CI: 4.4, 9.1) and Australia (6.3% CI: 5.3, 7.4) with a lower prevalence in North America (5.0% CI: 4.1-5.9) and Latin America and Caribbean (4.4% CI: 3.2-6.1). Females were found to have a higher prevalence than males (combined OR 1.22; 95% CI: 1.14, 1.30). The most commonly affected teeth were mandibular second premolars followed by maxillary lateral incisors and maxillary second premolars. The prevalence of mild, moderate and severe hypodontia was found to be 81.6, 14.3 and 3.1% respectively.

CONCLUSIONS: There was a high variation in the prevalence of hypodontia between the studies. African populations were found to have a higher risk for tooth agenesis and there was an increased risk for females to have hypodontia than males.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)299-316
Number of pages18
JournalJournal of Orthodontics
Volume41
Issue number4
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - Dec 2014

Bibliographical note

© 2014 British Orthodontic Society.

Keywords

  • hypodontia
  • dental agenesis
  • congenitally absent teeth
  • prevalence
  • epidemiology

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Prevalence of hypodontia and associated factors: a systematic review and meta-analysis'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this