Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach

Stephanie G. Craig, Lesley A. Anderson, Andrew G. Schache, Michael Moran, Laura Graham, Keith Currie, Keith Rooney, Max Robinson, Navdeep S. Upile, Rachel Brooker, Mina Mesri, Victoria Bingham, Stephen McQuaid, Terry Jones, Dennis J. McCance, Manuel Salto-Tellez, Simon S. McDade, Jacqueline A. James* (Corresponding Author)

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

51 Citations (Scopus)
7 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Background: TNM8 staging for oropharyngeal squamous cell carcinomas (OPSCC) surrogates p16 immunohistochemistry for HPV testing. Patients with p16+ OPSCC may lack HPV aetiology. Here, we evaluate the suitability of TNM8 staging for guiding prognosis in such patients. Methods: HPV status was ascertained using p16 immunohistochemistry and high-risk HPV RNA and DNA in situ hybridisation. Survival by stage in a cohort of OPSCC patients was evaluated using TNM7/TNM8 staging. Survival of p16+/HPV− patients was compared to p16 status. Results: TNM8 staging was found to improve on TNM7 (log rank p = 0·0190 for TNM8 compared with p = 0·0530 for TNM7) in p16+ patients. Patients who tested p16+ but were HPV− (n = 20) had significantly reduced five-year survival (33%) compared to p16+ patients (77%) but not p16− patients (35%). Cancer stage was reduced in 95% of p16+/HPV− patients despite having a mortality rate twice (HR 2.66 [95% CI: 1.37–5.15]) that of p16+/HPV+ patients under new TNM8 staging criteria. Conclusion: Given the significantly poorer survival of p16+/HPV− OPSCCs, these data provide compelling evidence for use of an HPV-specific test for staging classification. This has particular relevance in light of potential treatment de-escalation that could expose these patients to inappropriately reduced treatment intensity as treatment algorithms evolve.

Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)827-833
Number of pages7
JournalBritish Journal of Cancer
Volume120
Early online date20 Mar 2019
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 16 Apr 2019

Bibliographical note

ACKNOWLEDGEMENTS
The funders had no role in study design, collection, data analysis or interpretation
of the data. This work received funding from the Medical Research Council (D.Mc.C.
and J.J.), the Health and Social Care Research and Development Division of the
Northern Ireland Public Health Agency (D.M.c.C., J.J., M.Mo.), the Wellcome Trust
through the Wellcome-FDS Research Training Fellowship, the Faculty of Dental
Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of England (A.G.S.) and GlaxoSmithKline Ltd (T.J.). The Northern Ireland OPSCC TMAs used in this research were received from the Northern Ireland Biobank which has received funds from Health and Social Care Research and Development Division of the Public Health Agency in Northern Ireland and the Friends of the Cancer Centre. The Northern Ireland Cancer Registry who receives funding from the Northern Ireland Public Health Agency carried out collection of clinical data for the Northern Ireland OPSCC patients. The Faculty of Dental Surgery of the Royal College of Surgeons of England and the Liverpool Bio-innovation Hub Biobank carried out collection of clinical data for the Liverpool OPSCC patients.

Keywords

  • head and neck cancer
  • prognostic markers

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Recommendations for determining HPV status in patients with oropharyngeal cancers under TNM8 guidelines: a two-tier approach'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this