Smart or diverse start-up teams? Evidence from a field experiment

Simon Parker, Sander Hoogendoorn, Mirjam van Praag

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

16 Citations (Scopus)


This paper explores the relationship between cognitive abilities and team performance in a start-up setting. We argue that performance in this setting hinges on three tasks: opportunity recognition, problem solving, and implementation. We theorize that cognitive ability at the individual level has a positive effect on opportunity recognition and problem solving but no clear effect on implementation. Within teams, a combination of higher and lower cognitive ability levels may be productive insofar as some individuals can be assigned to mundane tasks (that are often involved in implementation), while others can be assigned to tasks that impose a greater cognitive load (problem solving or opportunity recognition). We present the results of a field experiment in which 573 students in 49 teams started up and managed real companies. We ensured exogenous variation in—otherwise random—team composition by assigning students to teams based on their measured cognitive abilities. Each team performed a variety of tasks, often involving complex decision making. The key result of the experiment is that the performance of start-up teams first increases and then decreases with ability dispersion. Strikingly, average team ability is not related to team performance.
Original languageEnglish
Pages (from-to)1010-1028
Number of pages19
JournalOrganization Science
Issue number6
Publication statusPublished - 17 Nov 2017


  • ability dispersion
  • team performance
  • field experiment
  • entrepreneurship


Dive into the research topics of 'Smart or diverse start-up teams? Evidence from a field experiment'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this