Social selection is density dependent but makes little contribution to total selection in New Zealand giraffe weevils

David Fisher* (Corresponding Author), Rebecca J. LeGrice, Christina J. Painting

*Corresponding author for this work

Research output: Contribution to journalArticlepeer-review

1 Citation (Scopus)
5 Downloads (Pure)

Abstract

Social selection occurs when traits of interaction partners influence an indi- vidual’s fitness and can alter total selection strength. However, we have little idea of what factors influence social selection’s strength. Further, social selec- tion only contributes to overall selection when there is phenotypic assortment, but simultaneous estimates of social selection and phenotypic assortment are rare. Here, we estimated social selection on body size in a wild population of New Zealand giraffe weevils (Lasiorhynchus barbicornis). We measured phenotypic assortment by body size and tested whether social selection varied with sex ratio, density and interacted with the body size of the focal individual. Social selection was limited and unaffected by sex ratio or the size of the focal individual. However, at high densities social selection was negative for both sexes, consistent with size-based com- petitive interactions for access to mates. Phenotypic assortment was always close to zero, indicating negative social selection at high densities will not impede the evolution of larger body sizes. Despite its predicted importance, social selection may only influence evolutionary change in specific contexts, leaving direct selection to drive evolutionary change.
Original languageEnglish
Article number20210696
Number of pages8
JournalProceedings of the Royal Society B: Biological Sciences
Volume288
Issue number1952
DOIs
Publication statusPublished - 9 Jun 2021

Bibliographical note

Funding
D.N.F. was supported by the University of Aberdeen. R.L.G. was supported by a University of Auckland Masters Scholarship during data collection. C.J.P. was supported by a Rutherford Foundation Postdoctoral Fellowship during the writing of this manuscript.

Acknowledgements
We thank John Staniland and Forest and Bird Wait- akere for continuously supporting our research at Matuku Reserve. Data collection was made possible by many volunteers, especially Jessica Le Grice, Robin Le Grice and Stephen Wallace. Two anonymous reviewers made very constructive comments. We have no competing interests.

Keywords

  • brentine
  • density dependent
  • fitness
  • phenotypic assortment
  • social selection
  • weevil

Fingerprint

Dive into the research topics of 'Social selection is density dependent but makes little contribution to total selection in New Zealand giraffe weevils'. Together they form a unique fingerprint.

Cite this