Abstract
The recent “no-platforming” of social historian Selina Todd and former Conservative MP Amber Rudd has reignited the debate about protecting free speech in universities. Both had their invited lectures cancelled at the last minute on the grounds of previous public statements with which the organisers disagreed.
Many people have interpreted these acts as hostile behaviour aimed at silencing certain views. But is this primarily about free speech?
Many people have interpreted these acts as hostile behaviour aimed at silencing certain views. But is this primarily about free speech?
Original language | English |
---|---|
Specialist publication | The Conversation |
Publication status | Published - 11 Mar 2020 |
Bibliographical note
Beth Lord has previously received funding from the Arts and Humanities Research Council for her work on Spinoza.Alexander Douglas does not work for, consult, own shares in or receive funding from any company or organisation that would benefit from this article, and has disclosed no relevant affiliations beyond their academic appointment.
Keywords
- Philosophy
- Enlightenment
- Amber Rudd
- No Platform
- Spinoza
- University of Oxford
- Cancel culture